Has privatisation of Land Registry really been ‘quietly abandoned’?

The property industry must keep up the pressure on the Government for the Land Registry to be kept in public hands after a sell-off seems to have been quietly abandoned, a search company has said.

Andrew Lloyd, managing director of Search Acumen, said privatisation of the Land Registry should be kept off the table after it was absent from the Neighbourhood Planning and Infrastructure Bill.

A consultation on privatisation of the Land Registry had been launched in May and a sell-off was mentioned in the Queen’s Speech, but Lloyd says its absence from proposed legislation does not mean the end of the matter.

He added: “The Land Registry has come in for quite a bit of criticism over the years for being outdated, old fashioned, inefficient. That’s part of the rationale for a sale.

“But over the past few years things have actually moved in a much more positive direction, with the Land Registry making great strides in commercialising its data, and in grasping the potential of ‘big data’.

“This has allowed innovators and disrupters in the private sector to transform the industry for the better through new products that utilise Land Registry data. Entrepreneurs and creative minds are unlocking the opportunities buried in big data, and deploying that acumen to create efficiencies for property and legal professionals.

“The Land Registry is committed to going further and releasing more of its data sets in the near future, so why privatise and jeopardise all of this progress?

“As the UK follows the post-Brexit journey and the housing crisis continues, I hope that the Land Registry is used efficiently to help strengthen our industry rather than add to our problems.”

x

Email the story to a friend



2 Comments

  1. Robert May

    “The Land Registry has come in for quite a bit of criticism over the years for being outdated, old fashioned, inefficient. That’s part of the rationale for a sale”  he forgot to add ‘and wrong’. To date we (Rummage4) have identified over 160,000 data errors in the land registry data set, errors which have distorted official statistics by  some truly eye watering and incredible amounts.

    I am proud to say rather than being disrupters some of us are  working hard  to make sure the industry is protected from  disrupters and wrong doers who are using the data to mislead and deceive the public in order to get their  greedy snouts into a very lucrative trough.

    Report
    1. Robert May

      Oink, Oink, Oink!

      Report
X

You must be logged in to report this comment!

Comments are closed.

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.