New Court of Appeal decision in tenancy deposit case

A new Court of Appeal decision could affect some long-standing tenancies.

In the case of Charalambous v Ng the deposit was taken in 2002, before tenancy deposit protection became mandatory in April 2007.

The tenancy went periodic in 2005, and in 2012 the landlord served a Section 21 notice.

However, the Court of Appeal has ruled that this was invalid.

It said that the landlord was not in breach of tenancy deposit regulations and so could not be sued for any penalty.

However, the Housing Act says that a Section 21 notice cannot be served if the “deposit is not being held in accordance with an approved scheme”.

The implications are that landlords who took deposits before April 2007 should either protect the deposit in an approved scheme and serve the prescribed information, or return the deposit to the tenant should they want to issue a Section 21 notice.

There is a very good explanation by lawyer David Smith – who believes the case has put the cat among the pigeons – here

The actual case can be read here

Homesearch EOS

Email the story to a friend

One Comment

  1. Will

    It seems yet another case where the Government have not properly drafted their laws. May be it is also a case of too much money being spent on lawyers. The world seems to have lost the basic premise of the intention of the parties!


You must be logged in to report this comment!

Comments are closed.

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.