Former Premier League footballer hit with hefty fine for unlicensed properties

Former Premier League footballer Dexter Blackstock has been ordered to pay back more than £8,000 in rent repayments, in addition to the hefty fine he previously received, for unlicensed rental properties.

Nottingham City Council said that Blackstock, who invested in the buy-to-let market, failed to licence his properties and must now pay back £8,593 in rent payment he received, on top of the £24,000 he was fined in October 2019.

Former striker Blackstock, 34, played for a number of English clubs, including Southampton, Leeds Utd, Nottingham Forrest, QPR, and Derby County.

Blackstock was previously fined £24,000 for owning rented homes which had no licences. The offences related to properties in and around Nottingham.

In addition, he was ordered to pay £1,100 costs and a victim surcharge of £170 by the court in October 2019.

Following the prosecution, Nottingham City Council applied for a Rent Repayment Order for two properties where housing benefits had been paid.

The First-tier Property Chamber has now made its decision public that Blackstock must make a Rent Repayment Order of £8,592.98.

Cllr Linda Woodings, portfolio holder for planning, housing and heritage at Nottingham City Council, commented: “This has been a long and complex case for our Safer Housing team, from investigations to prosecution and finishing with this great result on the Rent Repayment Order.

“Housing Benefit is paid out from the council to support residents in paying their rent. Following this conviction, we had to recuperate the money that Mr Blackstock was not entitled to.

“This could have all been avoided if Mr Blackstock licensed his properties or engaged and worked with us. However, when this doesn’t happen, we will always take the strongest action possible to help improve the standards of rented properties.”

Sprift 3 end of article
x

Email the story to a friend

One Comment

  1. A W

    TL; DR: Council recouping money / taking a landlord to court who provides quality (social) housing but didn’t license their property. What a win for the system! 

    Report
X

You must be logged in to report this comment!

Comments are closed.

More top news stories

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.