Would you sell your granny? Because that’s akin to the sale of the Land Registry

Would you sell your own grandmother?

On March 24 this year the Government launched a consultation on moving Land Registry operations to the private sector. That consultation closes on May 26.

The Land Registry is one of the most important of public sector assets that, in my opinion, should never be sold or substantially tampered with. Raising money in this way, in order to reduce the public deficit, is short-sighted and dangerous.

For most people in England and Wales, safe and secure ownership of their property is of paramount importance, for the most obvious of reasons. Their property is their biggest asset and will, in many cases, provide their families with financial security for generations to come.

In the 42 years I have been involved in conveyancing there has been one constant provider of reliable service and that is the Land Registry. The Government selling it is akin to having the morals of someone prepared to sell their own grandmother.

The Government’s proposal would mean a private company, rather than the impartial and statutory Land Registry, would be adjudicating title on transactions between other private companies, on the land rights of citizens, of mortgage lenders, and local and central government. This makes no sense.

A few points to consider:

  • The Land Registry underpins property ownership worth £4 trillion across England and Wales including £1 trillion of mortgages
  • The Land Registry holds over 24m titles of land
  • It should remain under impartial control
  • It provides a guaranteed register of interests in land
  • It is run at no cost to the Exchequer
  • A new owner is likely to want to increase prices
  • A new owner would seek to increase profits and is likely to want to ‘streamline’ services
  • A new owner would effectively have a monopoly market
  • With property fraud on the increase and the Land Registry in many cases the last barrier to a fraud being perpetrated, the continued first-class service being provided is vital
  • Selling the Land Registry is financially very short-sighted. It already makes a substantial profit. With a very modest increase in the cost of some of the services provided, that profit could increase
  • The Land Registry being run by a new owner might not be as efficient, causing delays in registrations and other applications, resulting in more transactions falling through.

Never has the expression’ if it isn’t broken, don’t fix it’ come to mind so readily. If you are opposed to the privatisation of the Land Reistry please sign the petition (and ask others to do the same).

If you would like to get more actively involved please email me (rh@boldgroup.co.uk) and I will let you know what more you can do.

Rob Hailstone 07817 630714

www.boldgroup.co.uk

x

Email the story to a friend



2 Comments

  1. Will

    My name is David and my mate George are conservatives so yes of course we would sell my grand mother!!!!!!!  We wanted to call ourselves the Chipmonks but the name has been used so we think perhaps the “Asset Strippers” might work for us?

    Report
  2. Peter

    Hmmm, sell granny!

    Report
X

You must be logged in to report this comment!

Comments are closed.

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.