New stamp duty cut clears first Commons hurdle but opposition MPs voice concerns

The Stamp Duty Land Tax (Reduction) Bill 2022-23 has been introduced and given its first and second readings in the House of Commons.

The reduction of SDLT for certain acquisitions of residential property in England and Northern Ireland, by increasing the threshold below which no SDLT is paid and increasing the thresholds for first-time buyer’s relief was announced at the recent mini-Budget and took effect from 23 September 2022.

MPs voted 288 to 152, a majority of 136, to give the Stamp Duty Land Tax (Reduction) Bill a second reading.

However, some questioned whether the Bill would survive Rishi Sunak’s coronation as Tory leader, with Labour and the Lib Dems suggesting a U-turn may await the legislation in the near future.

The Bill is one of the few measures which survived the Liz Truss’s disastrous mini-budget following the economic turmoil it caused, alongside the repeal of the national insurance rise.

These cuts to stamp duty will mean that an estimated 43% of transactions each year will pay absolutely no stamp duty whatsoever.

It would increase the threshold for not paying stamp duty from properties worth £125,000 to those worth £250,000.

Treasury minister Felicity Buchan told the Commons the Bill will also expand on the “generosity” of the stamp duty holiday during the Covid-19 pandemic “to ensure that those purchasing their first home pay no stamp duty on purchases up to £425,000”.

She added: “The maximum purchase value for which first-time buyers can claim the relief has also been increased from £500,000 to £625,000.

“These cuts to stamp duty will mean that an estimated 43% of transactions each year will pay absolutely no stamp duty whatsoever. That’s up from 25% before the provisions of this Bill.

“No one purchasing a second home or investing in a buy to let property will be taken out of paying stamp duty as the 3% surcharge on the purchase of additional dwellings will continue to apply.”

Buchan told MPs that the Bill would “will allow more people to buy and to move each year”, adding: “This will also mean more business for painters, decorators, moving companies, plumbers, electricians and all of the industries reliant on a healthy housing market.”

Shadow Treasury minister James Murray criticised the government for delaying the remaining stages of the Bill, which were due to be considered this week.

He said: “This last-minute flip flop of parliamentary business sends a message that it is open to the new prime minister and whoever his chancellor might be to change their mind over the stamp duty changes.

“By delaying the Bill’s remaining stages, the government has introduced yet more uncertainty into the housing market which frankly is the last thing anyone needs.”

Murray added: “At a time when our economy is reeling from the long-term damage the Conservatives have done, when current and future homebuyers are facing spiralling and prohibitive mortgage costs, and when we are still flying in the dark as the Tories have refused to publish the OBR forecasts, it is not the time to spend £1.7bn a year on this tax cut.”

Liberal Democrat MP Tim Farron told the Commons: “It is very hard to support a proposal which is the sole, straggling survivor of a disastrous mini-budget and one suspects the only reason it has survived is because the people who are hurt by it are people who live in communities the Government think they can take for granted. Well they can’t, and they mustn’t be allowed to do so.”

The former Lid Dem leader added: “I do not understand why the government is clinging on to this proposal which will do such little good even for those people it will help, and such amount of harm to those it will do harm to, when it has the chance to think again.

“I would urge them very strongly that they should do just that.”



Email the story to a friend


  1. ValueCounts31

    Rishi should cancel this. We need to stamp out inflation and all this does is create more liquidity to fuel inflation. It was different before when there, in theory, a need to keep transactions going, and property sales create secondary affects to spending e.g. white good sales etc. Where as now completely different scenario. We need to reduce demand to slow down price growth e.g. inflation. Politian’s will not say it as clearly as this… but ultimately demand for everything has to go down. That means a reduction of living standards. Not a popular thing to say. Help needs to then be targeted to the most unfortunate amongst us that can’t switch to basics ranges, downsize or cut down on holidays or entertainment, but are literally already as the most basic of living standards pre cost of living crisis. The rest of us are unfortunately going to need to make tough decisions on spending, that might include being forced to downsize, or not have holidays etc etc. Probably not a popular opinion on here but stabilizing inflation is more important than getting that extra 10% or 20% of sales through. But also consider forcing households to make tough decisions may create transactions in itself. E.g. households downsizing etc. Rather than relying on the government bailing us out to subsidize our ways of life. My view is if the right decisions are made by government, transactions volumes will drop to pre-pandemic norms. House price growth will slow to low single digits and unfortunately repossessions or stressed sales will increase.

  2. aSalesAgent

    Get rid of the recent changes to SDLT, they do very little good for individuals, and FTBs don’t need the extra help. I’d rather see savings for the elderly who are cash poor and feel trapped in a homes that are too expensive to heat and maintain. If they were encouraged to downsize it could unlock a large number of family-size homes for second-steppers, who would then go on to employ electricians, Gas safe engineers, decorators, etc, to modernise the property.

  3. Rascal612

    Agree with some of aSalesAgent view….I’d go even further with this awful tax…..reduce the tax burden set by Gordon Brown in 1997 so that 1st/2nd/3rd time sellers who move upwards/downwards/sideways are not taxed by stealth for simply moving…how is £15k-£40k SDLT fair for many middle value sellers for their onward purchase?


You must be logged in to report this comment!

Comments are closed.

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.