Landlord ordered to pay back nearly £15,000 in rent to tenants

Mould at the Butterridges Close property

An unlicensed landlord has been ordered to pay back almost £15,000 in rent to his tenants after they were forced to live in “dangerous and disgusting conditions”.

When officers from Barking and Dagenham Council visited the privately-owned two-bed flat in Butteridges Close, Dagenham, they found a catalogue of problems including damp and mould throughout the property and only one functioning heater.

It also had no working smoke alarms, the kitchen cupboards were all broken, the oven plug had been secured using duct tape, there was an exposed light in the bathroom, and a severe infestation of bed bugs.

The flat’s landlord, Kehinde Wilson Gbadegesin, of Greenwich, was charged £1,200 per month for the former local authority flat, however, he had already been fined more than £11,000 in February this year after failing to carry out improvements and failing to register for a private rented property license. EYE carried the story – see below.

At a tribunal, held online on Friday 4 August, at which Barking and Dagenham Council acted on behalf of the tenants to issue the rent repayment order under the Housing and Planning Act 2016, a judge ordered Gbadegesin to pay back rent for the period between February 2022 and January 2023 – totalling £14,400 – as well as a pay a further £300 to cover the costs of his tenant’s application and the hearing fee.

Councillor Syed Ghani, Cabinet Member for Enforcement and Community Safety, said: “No one should be left to live in dangerous and disgusting conditions such as those faced by these tenants, so I am pleased to hear this rogue landlord will be made to pay back every penny he unscrupulously took from them.

“Our private rented property licensing scheme is there to improve standards for all, and I hope this sends a strong message that we will continue to take action against the small minority who think they can flout the rules and do as they please.”


Electrics at the Butteridges Close property

Estate agency handed hefty fine for ‘unacceptable’ property


Email the story to a friend!


  1. jeremy1960

    Licensing is irrelevant here, all issues dealt with under existing legislation which would have applied to any landlord.

    1. Woodentop

      Agreed, however two advantages of licensing is the landlord has to register (so many rogues no-one knows who they are to enforce) and no licence = can’t be a landlord, which is so much easier to enforce.

      The down side is too many local authorities jumped onto the gravy train and no enforcement or became costly bureaucratic paper filling. .

      1. jan-byers

        If a LL decided not to register he will still get tenants in a market in which there is a shortage of rental property

        Even good  LL may not register as it is just yet another additional cost



You must be logged in to report this comment!

Comments are closed.

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.