Industry leaders slam ‘shambolic’, ‘farcical’ and ‘archaic’ conveyancing system

Property experts across the property industry have joined forces to criticise what has been described as the ‘shambolic’, ‘farcical’ and ‘archaic’ conveyancing system.

Following reports of record times in property conveyancing, property and mortgage industry experts have shared their views on the current conveyancing process.

Though some supported conveyancers, others labelled the conveyancing industry ‘broken’, with one suggesting that we need to urgently use the blockchain to solve the problem.

Industry comments:

Simon Shinerock, chairman of Horley-based Choices Estate Agency: “Ever since technology rode to the rescue of the old-fashioned, cumbersome and bureaucratic conveyancing system we use in this country, things have got steadily worse. It’s a bit like David Cameron promising a bonfire of red tape, followed by the largest rise in red tape in history.

“Technology is definitely the answer but to work it has to be joined up and all the players in the game must have access to the system. The technology already exists to link buyers, sellers, agents, conveyancers, lenders, mortgage advisers and local authorities, it’s called ‘the blockchain’.

“Yes, the blockchain does have other uses than creating useless crypto currency Ponzi schemes. There is even a company called Coadjute working on a solution and starting to make progress but really, like WiFi for everyone, this should be a Government-sponsored project. Unfortunately, it’s not just technology that is not joined up. The Government is wholly unable to keep up with the pace of change, much less respond to it or take a lead role.”


Lewis Shaw, founder of Mansfield-based Shaw Financial Services: “Conveyancing has been a bugbear since before the pandemic, and Covid simply exposed and turbocharged the failings and cracks in conveyancing processes.

“Mortgage lenders, mortgage brokers, estate agents and surveyors have all implemented technology to increase efficiencies in their businesses, yet conveyancing is still firmly stuck in the 1890s. For example, many firms still send out paper packs to complete, or 10 PDFs for a customer to print, complete, and post back, without any help on how to fill the forms in. For god’s sake, how difficult is it to build a data capture form, for example?

“Delays in transactions have led to mortgage offers expiring, causing us as brokers to select a new mortgage product at the same time as rates have risen. I personally had a deal recently where the mortgage applied for was 1.14% fixed for five years; the offer expired, which meant I had to select a new product, 1.92%, all because the chain took eight months to complete meaning the customer had a significantly higher mortgage payment because of delays caused by solicitors.

“As brokers, we’re constantly bombarded by clients asking where things are up to with solicitors; often, we’re none the wiser. There are three things that almost every conveyancer could get better at; communication, communication and communication. It often feels like they’d rather pick a snake up than answer the phone. As we all know, buying or selling a home is stressful, expensive and emotional; it can only be as good as the weakest link.

“Currently, conveyancing isn’t just the weakest link, it’s completely broken. We need root and branch overhaul as the current delays and issues will only worsen without wholesale adoption of technology. Recently I’ve arranged mortgages and had offers issued in four hours. What good is that when the solicitors will then take a further four months, at best, to complete the transaction?

“Conveyancing firms need to increase productivity and drive innovation; otherwise, they could find themselves redundant if someone develops an end-to-end tech-driven solution.”


Joe Garner, managing director at London-based property developer, NewPlace: “Archaic conveyancing practices unchanged for 100 years perpetuated by a stubborn refusal to move on from quill and ink signatures, hard paper copies and postal searches result in the average offer to acceptance period shooting up to an agonising 133-day average. My memory may be fuzzy but I am pretty sure it was bureaucracy that killed the cat and in the world of conveyancing, ‘tiddles’ is well and truly pushing up the daisies.

“An alternative system that doesn’t require too much of a jump from the current status quo could see the onus on the seller to provide the buyer with a full and honest disclosure of all known ‘structural and building’ and legal issues relating to the property to be sold. The change in legal responsibility would mean the seller would need to get his or her ducks all in a row before proceeding with the sale process by submitting a detailed contractual pack of information. However, seeing as we are in 2022 and not 1922, perhaps it is time for a full makeover as opposed to a bit of lippy and a slap of the cheeks?

“Technology offers the key to facilitating a path of least resistance, even in a notoriously slow and convoluted area such as conveyancing. We need greater communication, speedier actions and additional transparency through to completions. Less of a reliance on human back-office staff would result in a slicker process across the board, cutting down errors and inefficiencies which invariably drive up the time taken to complete the conveyance.

“Out of touch high-street conveyancers relying on old working methods are not integrating the kinds of technology demanded by clients, intermediaries and lenders, and should be a thing of the past. Conveyancing is desperate for the kind of treatment Stripe dished out to payments and Amazon blew the ecommerce world to smithereens with.”


Oli Pearce, director at Wellingborough-based Guild Mortgage Services: “The conveyancing system is absolutely shambolic. More often than not, the issue is a lack of organisation. We ourselves are ‘trying’ to move home and are speaking from experience. Our conveyancer emailed some pretty basic enquiries to our seller’s legal team on the 23rd May. The seller got these on the 8th June and they hand delivered their responses to their legal team on the 10th June. They were emailed to my conveyancer on Friday 1st July. It shouldn’t take almost six weeks to deal with some standard legal enquiries. The pandemic is still an easy ‘get out clause’ for the lack of service from some firms. The process for buying a home needs a big shake up.”


Paul Neal of Derbyshire-based Missing Element Mortgage Services: “It feels that solicitors are grabbing every bit of business they can without thinking “can we actually do this”. There are some real frustrations within the industry especially when it comes to free legals. What you get for free you pay for tenfold in frustration. Many lenders are closing their doors to allow them to catch up. Maybe solicitors need to do the same.”


Luke Loveridge, CEO at Bristol-based property specialist, Propflo: “A shortage of lawyers and, possibly, working from home will have some bearing on the current long transaction times, but productivity is the core issue. We’ve seen up to 80% of a conveyancer’s time on some transactions being wasted chasing parties for information. More upfront information and better prepared buyers and sellers are crucial to reducing transaction times. Thankfully there are a number of initiatives and technology providers working on facilitating more upfront information, better preparing sellers and buyers before they even start the process, and making the process more streamlined and digital. Although no immediate solace to the eye-wateringly long transaction times, the next few years should start to see a revolution — driven by things like AI and distributed ledge technologies — in how we buy and sell our homes.”


Rhys Schofield, managing director at Belper-based Peak Mortgages and Protection: “The situation is a total farce at the moment. It used to be that having to request an offer extension for a client which normally lasts six months was a once in a blue moon event, now it’s a regular occurrence because too much work is dealt with by sausage factory conveyancers. These outfits when they come up with a problem are happy to ‘send an email’ to get the case off their desk for a fortnight rather than spend a bit of time on the phone actually sorting the matter.

“As it stands, the market seems like it’s being propped up by conscientious mortgage brokers and their admins who seem to be doing everyone else’s chasing for them. Yet again, when other parts of the housing and mortgage market are on their backsides when it comes to service levels, it’s mortgage brokers holding the whole house of cards up. There are good conveyancers out there though and finding a good one is so vital that we’ve even taken matters into our own hands and are building our own platform for finding a quality conveyancer because no one else seems to have the desire to actually try to improve the situation. To be honest though, just chuck our current process in the bin and start again using modern technology. Why are we still more or less working within a set of processes hundred of years old when the rest of the world is doing this better?”


Simon Allen, director at Knutsford-based property finance broker, Searchlight Finance: “Conveyancing was near to breaking point before Covid and working from home is now the convenient excuse for years of neglect and underinvestment. Clear communication and delivering to agreed timescales isn’t too much of an ask, but for most firms it’s very difficult to achieve. Improvements in technology could reduce most of the issues that cause the delays as well as using the good old fashioned phone. Yes conveyancing can be complex but a call between both sides in the transaction is so much quicker than weeks of emails to resolve outstanding enquiries.”


Ben Tadd, director at Chippenham-based broker, Lucra Mortgages: “The conveyancing system in the UK right now is deeply flawed, and there is no getting away from the fact that the whole process needs to be overhauled with swathes of technology required to help digitalise the process, and cut down on the huge amounts of paperwork required by purchasers. This, however, is not a quick fix.”


Robert Payne, director of Bristol-based Langley House Mortgages: “In order for conveyancers to operate efficiently, they need to be highly communicative, not just with clients but also with other conveyancers in the chain. This seems to be the biggest failing in the industry and is most likely caused by a number of reasons including unmanageable workloads, lack of innovation of technology and mounting pressure from buyers. There’s no quick fix but I have seen some of the more reputable firms, who charge higher fees turning business away because they don’t want to compromise their service, which seems like a good solution if you want to retain customers and staff. Perhaps raising fees and reducing the amount of volume would be an appropriate move for other firms too, rather than drowning in greed.”


Marcus Wright, MD of Bolton Business Finance: “Honestly, if conveyancing was any slower, it would be going backwards. The whole process is slow, outdated and very frustrating for me and my clients. Things still being lost in the post, bits of paper flying here, there and everywhere. The legal profession, banks and the government need to come together to modernise and streamline it. Improvements would provide economic benefits to the economy for sure.”


Ashley Thomas, director of London-based mortgage broker, Magni Finance: “Without doubt the processing times have increased for purchasing a property. This is across the board, you cannot point the finger at conveyancers as the main reason. Yes, they are slower as they have been inundated with increased business and trying to manage service with more staff working from home. However, you could argue this is the same for other parties. Mortgage lenders are very busy. With rates increasing on a daily basis, clients are looking to renew their rates as soon as possible. Where they have given short notice with rate changes it has resulted in huge volumes of business being submitted. This then slows the process for all the mortgage applications, the average time to get a mortgage offer has definitely increased in recent months. Also, it will invariably be longer for those purchasing in a chain as it is harder to purchase a property with current supply and demand. For every property being sold, most have numerous offers. We had one the other day where a client was competing with over 18 offers.”



Email the story to a friend


  1. CWoodhouse

    I don’t think it’s shambolic, it’s not ideal granted. Conveyancers can adopt simple technology, such as our service, to digitally enable themselves.

    [Comment removed. PROPERTY INDUSTRY EYE TERMS & CONDITIONS #6. Users may not use comments to promote a service or business.]

  2. LVW4

    Where are the comments from conveyancers?

    I agree wholeheartedly with the comments. I’ve been trying to sell a flat with no complications and no chain to a cash buyer since the start of January. I chose a local solicitor who claimed to be using technology to streamline the process, which appealed to me as I have a process automation background. The first problem was filling in and signing the forms online when 2 sellers are in different places. I had to resort to manual completion. The next problem has dogged the process since, in that I was able to upload all the details and documents required because I am a director of our Ltd RTM Co, but my solicitor has never bothered to read them. Instead, asking questions to which they already have the answers. These questions took less than a day for me to answer, were often asked more than once, and then took weeks for my solicitor to pass to the buyer. On numerous occasions, I had to ask my estate agent to speak to the buyer’s solicitor with the answers, and to ascertain which questions were outstanding. Throughout the process, my solicitor was protected by a ‘firewall’ of ‘teams’; Team Jones, Team Smith, Team Useless… Preventing me speaking to her.

    I should, at last, Complete this week. Buyer has signed the contract, funds are in… but I still expect my solicitor to delay!

    I have bought and sold houses in excess of £1m, but I’ve never been so frustrated as with this £120k sale!

  3. #ImpressiveConveyancing

    Industry leaders?

    And an article about how to fix conveyancing without actually asking any conveyancers to explain what we want changing to make offer to exchange even faster for the public?

    Pointless article.

  4. Alan Murray professional conveyancer mentor trainer consultant

    Lazy journalism. Not really a story, a press release put out by some talking heads that I’ve seen referred to on other similar websites.

    What I can’t understand is how after more than forty years in the profession I have never heard of any of these so called ‘property experts’?

    Says it all really. Just another conveyancer bashing exercise by people who clearly know nothing about the strains of working in the profession these days. One of which is the considerable difficulties involved in dealing with Lenders, which the mortgage brokers quoted here will no doubt be aware of.

  5. John Wathen

    There is only one reason why the conveyancing process hasn’t been (& won’t be) modernised & streamlined & that is powerful vested interests. Dragging it out & complicating it has provided a highly lucrative, easy income stream for legal firms for ever. The lenders don’t help by making the lawyers responsible for everything. Efficient, speedy, cooperative Conveyancers are worth their weight in gold but because the Judiciary hold so much power in this country, nothing is likely to change. I go back to the 1970s & the stubborn, infuriating delays have always been there. The Cash Cow will never be slaughtered!

  6. Wilson7160

    It is broken as the article describes. Sales are falling through due to mortgage offers running out, job losses etc. etc. conveyancing departments are telling agents to educate customers to the fact that it will take AT LEAST 16 weeks to be able to exchange (I genuinely got an exchange 25 minutes after a viewing in the 80’s, and they needed a mortgage!). I get the world has changed and it is now full of rear end covering but we are not using technology to deal with it.

    The LAND REGISTRY demonstrated a system they had developed with a tech firm to a group of us many many years ago that took all the mystery out of the process. What I can recollect is that Buyers, Sellers, Agents, Building Societies and Solicitors would have had to subscribe (Land Reg I believe is totally self funding- so good to hear something that works)  every transaction obviously had it’s own unique access for all concerned in the transaction. As far as I can recall, unless there was a particular problem with a title or management company, estimated time from the sale being tied up to exchange was approx. 10 to 15 days. I believe the reason it couldn’t go ahead was because only a few Search Departments were on line at the time. My understanding now is that a lot of our major cities are now on line but the question has to be asked why is it taking so long? In Hertfordshire where my offices are, searches are taking 6 to 7 weeks! They are not even applied for until the draft contract arrives, that sometimes takes 2 to 3 weeks, all of that should be within seconds of putting the access code in for that property.

    After seeing the Land Reg system, albeit many years ago, and I am sure there is now more bureaucracy that the system would have to cover, I believe that is the way forward. We need the Search Departments to come out of the dark ages, all information required for the conveyance to be on line and the Land Reg to get the system they designed back out of the cupboard.


You must be logged in to report this comment!

Comments are closed.

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.