‘Don’t ban referral fees – but make agents declare their existence and value early on’, plea by conveyancers

Referral fees paid by conveyancers to estate agents should not be banned – but their existence and their value should be disclosed.

Property law regulator the Council for Licensed Conveyancers said that both agents and conveyancers should be required to reveal the fees early on, giving people enough time to shop around if they wished.

The organization warned that if there were a ban on referral fees, conveyancers would have to increase their marketing spend: “It would also destabilising the conveyancing market by forcing firms to rewrite their business models overnight.”

CLC also said it saw nothing wrong with conveyancers being allowed to act for both buyer and seller, with parties in a chain finding it easier to track progress online.

CLIC has made its points in its response to the Government’s call for evidence on the home buying and selling process.

CLC has also told the Government that improving home buying and selling does not need legislation, with technology changes already making improvements.

The organisation said that ‘transformational change” is within reach.

In its response, it also calls for more information to be made available when a property is being marketed.

Without mentioning Home Information Packs, the CLC said that making relevant information available at the point of marketing was a “reasonable ambition and would achieve transformational improvement in the process.”

On referral fees CLC said that currently conveyancers divulge them when confirming their instructions with the client.

CLC said this is too late.

It said: “At this stage, the client is unlikely to consider whether they wish to continue to instruct that conveyancer or seek another who has not been referred, because they will be focused on moving their transaction forward.

“If estate agents and other referrers were to be required to inform clients of the referral fee (that it will be paid and its value) when they first take instruction from the client, that client would then have time to shop around if they wished.

“This approach would be much more likely to allow the industry as a whole to evolve as consumer behaviour changed over time.

“Unlike a ban, it would allow consumers to rely on the advice of an informed player in the industry, taking into account the fee attached to that referral.”

Homesearch EOS

Email the story to a friend


  1. Peter Ambrose (The Partnership)

    We agree with our regulator.

    The key word here is “informed” and how do consumers know what a good lawyer is unless they publish their performance data?

  2. J1

    It is because some agents lie, deceive or conceal these very fees that they should be banned.

    Why should an agent be able to earn £200 on a sale and a purchase for doing nothing more than giving a job to one of their mates????

    Conveyancers by and large would still exist if these fees didn’t.


  3. TwitterSalisPropNews53

    Of course cash bungs should be banned.

    Sadly, enormous volumes of the public are farmed to conveyancing organisations paying cash bungs. Because payments are so vast in total, the quality of the conveyancing organisation becomes irrelevant. As a result, the organisation need not bother to employ experts, and complaints do not matter, as they have a constant new reliable stream of bought members of the pubic, blissfully unaware of the quality of conveyancing about to be undertaken on their home move.



You must be logged in to report this comment!

Comments are closed.

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.