The House of Lords’ recognition during Monday 13 May’s discussion on amendments to the Renters’ Rights Bill as it passes through Committee Stage in the Upper House, that the regulation of property agents (RoPA) must become a reality has been welcomed by Propertymark.
However, the professional body also called for a firm timetable from the UK Government to implement mandatory qualifications for property agents.
Lord Best and other senior peers referenced Propertymark’s stances on this issue alongside calling for professional standards and a market balance between the private rental and holiday lets sectors.
After warning that billions of pounds of client money and millions of renters’ lives are determined by agents’ behaviour, he argued that regulation is supported by renters, landlords, Propertymark, and other sector organisations.
Propertymark has long supported and championed regulating property agents to professionalise the sector, enhance consumer protection and build further trust with landlords and tenants.
He concluded that “those who would be regulated are as keen on regulation as those consumers who would be protected by it.”
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the Ministry of Housing, Communities, and Local Government, Baroness Taylor of Stevenage, acknowledged the strength of feeling in the House and referred to a Written Ministerial Statement from November 2024, which committed the UK Government to revisiting the 2019 ROPA report.
She added that the Ministry for Housing, Communities, and Local Government intends to implement minimum qualifications for managing agents of leasehold properties and freehold estates via the widely expected Leasehold and Commonhold Reform Bill due to be published in the second half of this year. However, she refused to support the amendments outright.
Lord Best also suggested another amendment that proposed a fresh legal requirement for planning permission prior to the switch of a shorthold tenancy to a short-term letting. Propertymark has long called for compulsory registration, improved transparency, and planning restrictions to stop the exponential growth of short-term lettings from impacting housing supply. The Levelling Up and Regeneration Act includes provisions for greater regulation of short-term lets in England, including licensing schemes and planning controls. Propertymark says these measures must be enacted alongside the Renters’ Rights Bill to level the playing field.
Furthermore, Propertymark stressed before the debate that periodic tenancies with minimal notice periods, as suggested in the Renters’ Rights Bill, could be exploited to create de facto short lets, and that current regulatory and financial pressures could persuade more landlords to leave the private rented sector and turn to short-term lets.

Baroness Taylor said she intends to regulate short-term lets via a national registration scheme, but she admitted the scheme remains in development.
Timothy Douglas, head of policy and campaigns at Propertymark, said: “Propertymark is pleased to see continued acknowledgement from Peers that now is the time to act on the regulation of property agents. Although the UK Government prefers a phased approach, this lack of a firm timetable is disappointing as the property sector is going through significant change because of the proposals in the Renters’ Rights Bill, legislation impacting leaseholders, changing rules for financial sanctions checks and recent new building and fire safety requirements means there is a desperate need for a coordinate approach to regulation across multi-disciplines of property agency and management to protect consumers.
“These changes are important but without regulating and driving up standards for sales, lettings and managing agents who will implement these rules and work with consumers often at the start of their home buying and renting journey, the UK Government not only risks doing half a job when it comes to levelling up the housing market but this could risk thwarting confidence across the industry.
“We will continue to work with Ministers, officials, MPs, Peers and policymakers to ensure that regulation becomes a reality and compliments the proposals contained in the Renters’ Rights Bill and wider housing legislation.”
Apparently, the cure for all industry ills is a certificate and a code of conduct. Strange, then, that the RICS disciplinary hearings read like a desk sergeant’s daybook, and Parliament keeps producing headlines that would make Private Walker blush.
Meanwhile, an entire industry — and its suppliers — can spend four years working towards greater regulation, only to watch the regulator break down at the side of the road and quietly withdraw their guidance three weeks before enforcement was due.
But yes, clearly the issue is agents without diplomas and an annual audit.
By all means, let’s pile on more regulation — after all, it’s not like MPs or lobbyists have ever brought their professions into disrepute.
Let those without sin cast the first stone
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
With so many aspects which eventually feed into the home buying and selling process, such as B.Regs, Planning, BSA, etc, regulation is useless unless it is enforced, as we have seen with MI. Same applies to speed limits. Most “enforcers” either have a vested intested in not enforcing or do not have the resources to do so!
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
Bernie Madoff was highly regulated. Very capable at what he did. Many live to regret their decision to place their trust in him.
Regulation will not prevent those lacking integrity continuing to prosper – they will simply get more creative in ways to avoid scrutiny.
That’s the consequence of leading with competence instead of character. A rat race where the winner is still a rat.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
Financial services are regulated, but sadly there are more bad apples in it today than pre regulation. When a company spends .money on training and qualifications its reluctant to dismiss them readily.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register