Revised property information form gives new guidance on Japanese knotweed

Sellers are facing new requirements on the property information form when disclosing information about Japanese knotweed after the Law Society issued an updated TA6 form.

If they are not absolutely certain that the weed is absent, they must say so, enabling buyers to do their own investigations.

Previously the guidance stated: “The seller should state whether the property is affected by Japanese knotweed.”

The revised form and guidance now says: “The seller should state whether the property is affected by Japanese knotweed. If you are unsure that Japanese knotweed exists above or below ground or whether it has previously been managed on the property, please indicate this as ‘not known’.

“If no is chosen as an answer the seller must be certain that no rhizome (root) is present in the ground of the property, or within three metres of the property boundary even if there are no visible signs above ground.”

The Law Society said the revised TA6 was released in response to recommendations from the House of Commons Select Committee on Japanese knotweed.

The Law Society said: “We have reviewed and revised the Japanese knotweed question in the TA6 form and explanatory notes on an interim basis.

“We will review it again once the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has completed its own research into the treatment of Japanese knotweed in the conveyancing process in other jurisdictions.”

Nic Seal, of knotweed removal specialists Environet, said: “Without visual surveys, no reputable knotweed specialist could certify that no rhizome is present in the ground, reinforcing the message that the safe bet is to always answer ‘Don’t know’, except of course where the answer should be ‘Yes’.

“I therefore welcome the Law Society’s revisions to the TA6 form guidance.”

The new TA6 form also has changes regarding flood risk, septic tanks and radon.

https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/news/stories/updated-ta6-and-explanatory-notes-published/

x

Email the story to a friend



3 Comments

  1. Ed Mead

    Nic Seal says he welcomes this ruling – I bet he does. To have almost 1m sales a year legally having to register as ‘Don’t know’ means an explosion in business?

    Report
  2. s71

    time to make money for knot weed experts!!!!!

    it will become a must have report similar to EPC!!

    Report
  3. smile please

    Whatever happened to Caveat Emptor and common sense?

    Report
X

You must be logged in to report this comment!

Comments are closed.

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.