Rental properties taking 10% longer to let due to ‘Stamp Duty overhang’

Rents have grown by their slowest rate since the end of 2014 buoyed by a 12% jump in buy-to-let properties coming to market, Rightmove claims.

The portal’s Rental Tracker for the first quarter of 2017 identified an overhang from last year’s buy-to-let surge that it says means letting agents now need to work harder to secure tenants for landlords.

The figures show rents increased 1.8% year-on-year in the first quarter of 2017 to £768 a month on average.

This is the lowest since the last quarter of 2014 and less than half the annual growth of 3.9% recorded in the first three months of 2016.

Average rents in Greater London fell 4.2% to £1,937 a month, which is a slight improvement on the 4.4% annual drop recorded in the previous quarter.

The average time for a buy-to-let to stay on a letting agent’s books also increased to 33 days in the first quarter of 2017, up from 30 at the same time last year.

Sam Mitchell, head of lettings for Rightmove, said: “The supply boost following last year’s buy-to-let frenzy in the first few months of the year has continued through to 2017, introducing more competition in the market for letting agents trying to secure suitable tenants for their landlords’ properties.

“This extra choice for tenants in many areas has inevitably led to properties taking longer to let than this time last year. However, agents are still reporting that well-priced properties in popular areas are letting quickly.

“The new tax changes that started to phase in from this month may also lead to some landlords selling off properties and the extra Stamp Duty on buy-to-lets may deter some landlords from expanding their portfolios, so now seems to be the right time for tenants who want to have more choice to look around.”

Mitchell said that now might be the right time to encourage landlords “to give the place a lick of paint or some new furniture to give them the edge to help secure the right tenant”.


Email the story to a friend!


  1. seenitall

    We were and are gently holding back the rent increases this year and keeping them  low (with our landlords approval) so that when the tenant fee ban comes into play next year the rents will increase substantially across the board – with what would have been tenants fees now being paid by the landlord as one lump sum being recovered with a higher monthly rent to the tenant.

    Thus being cost neutral to the landlord and tenant in year 1 but if the tenant stays longer then unfortunatly as a by product they will be paying more and the owner getting more rent.  Our landlords accept this and resigned that this is all part and parcel of the Govt medling.   

    But equally the tenant wont have an upfront fee to pay so it must be good for them as well? perhaps? oh well.

  2. KByfield04

    The reality is that, in many parts of the country and especially in the capital, swathes of property have capped out. Earnings have changed little and, as such, constant increases were always going to have their days numbered. Tenants and buyers can only afford what they can afford- it really is that simple.


You must be logged in to report this comment!

Comments are closed.

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.