OPINION: Anti money-laundering – why are housebuilders treated differently to estate agents?

 Tim Barnett is CEO of Credas – an anti-money laundering technology platform – and he asks a very relevant question. Why don’t housebuilders have the same obligations as estate agents when it comes to anti money-laundering checks?

Each year there are over 1.5 million homes listed for sale in the UK and the potential sellers of each all require anti-money laundering checks – often there’s more than one check per property in the case of joint ownership.

Since June 2017 property buyers, at the point that an offer is accepted, are required to provide identification for the purposes of the agent carrying out such checks too. Not to mention the doubling up of checks by the legal representatives in each sale and purchase.

So the consequence of the regulations therefore is that far more AML checks are carried out each year than actual sales transactions – millions more.     

In other words the Government, in all its wisdom, is taking the question of clean money for property purposes rather seriously and no more so than against a backdrop of rising terrorist threats, organised criminal activity and sanctions on those connected to regimes that do bad things.

And so, it’s more difficult these days to wash your bad cash through the property industry and as AML technology continues to improve and government tightens the rules further as they seem set to do, the prospect of ‘bad guys’ using this industry to clean their ill-gotten gains diminishes and we can all hold our heads up high as not being complicit in such activities. 

Except for one glaring anomaly – in fact 209,393 of them.

Because, did you know that of all the new homes built and sold each year in the UK, none are subject to anti-money laundering checks by the housebuilder selling them?

Yes, the lawyers for each purchaser will do their AML checks I’m sure, however doesn’t this two-tier system make you wonder why, if house builders are exempt, estate agents are compelled to shoulder their own separate AML burden?

The government can’t have it both ways – it’s either important at the point of sale and purchase as in the case of estate agents listings and offers, or it’s not – as seemingly in the case of new homes developers.  

In the last 12 month period that figures are available for and based upon EPCs issued on new homes, that’s 209,393 opportunities for money to be laundered through the system.

Worse, this is not just nearly a quarter of a million loopholes but loopholes that are on average worth £367,200 per time. This makes for a frankly astonishing and wholly unacceptable gap of £76.9 billion in money laundering opportunity for criminal gangs, ISIS, sanctioned oligarchs and the like.

I find it incredible that the UK Government has allowed this gaping chasm of unlawful funds fiddling to remain open. 

Our research suggests that Britain is the second most prolific country on the planet for money laundering activity. It’s estimated that £87.9bn of dodgy money is filtered through the UK each year, second only to the USA which tops the table at a staggering £216bn.

When looking proportionally at the estimated amount of cash laundered in each country as a factor of GDP, Britain at 4.3% of GDP is fourth in the rankings below Belgium, Luxembourg and Israel.

I humbly suggest that politicians might bring themselves to closing this new homes sector disparity if we as a nation want to be able to hold our heads up high amongst others on the world stage rather than resembling a nation that seemingly does not care much about such things at all.

It would seem all too easy to do so, wouldn’t it? 

Homesearch EOS
x

Email the story to a friend



6 Comments

  1. SteveJ

    Sorry, but this whole article is a load of rubbish. I think Mr Barnett might want to actually speak to some housebuilders to see the level of checks in place. “Because, did you know that of all the new homes built and sold each year in the UK, none are subject to anti-money laundering checks by the housebuilder selling them” – this is factually incorrect.

    Report
    1. janbyerss

      He is talking total s+++

      Report
    2. localagent735

      i agree that there are probably some that do. We purchased a Cala home property in 2019 and didn’t get asked to proof funds or do any AML checks

      Report
  2. Woodentop

    I think he was referring to this ….

     
    While estate agents must be registered for anti-money-laundering purposes, developers who set up their own staffed sales offices on sites do not.
    The anomaly has emerged because developers are regarded as peer to peer or private sellers, which means, despite the fact they are selling properties on a commercial basis, they have no responsibilities when it comes to checking the identity of the buyer for AML purposes.

    Report
    1. janbyerss

      I am a developer we always do AML

      Report
  3. ARC

    The point that our esteemed author doesn’t understand or has not bothered to research is that the vast majority of developers (and certainly all the PLCs and therefore the vast majority of the transactions) do their AML checks whether ‘required to by law’ or not.

    The other point being that the buyers conveyancer in all of these instances will also have done AML checks on their clients as required by law.

    Report
X

You must be logged in to report this comment!

Comments are closed.

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.