NAEA conference 2017: Importance of Propertymark launch

There cannot be many conferences where the delegates enter the venue as members of one organisation and leave it as members of another, but that is pretty much what happened at yesterday’s NAEA conference held at 155 Bishopsgate in London.

The sell-out event had over 500 delegates attending and the first item on the day’s agenda was the opening address by Mark Hayward, managing director of the NAEA.

He spoke of the high standing of the organisation in government circles and how it now represents some 11,600 branches across the UK.

But that high standing is not so apparent to the general public and so, after much research and consultation with branding experts, all the divisions of NFoPP will henceforth be branded with the suffix of ‘Propertymark’ which will be consumer facing and promote the use of member agents because of the professionalism and protections offered to the public by the organisations.

A major long-term promotional campaign of the Propertymark brand, with substantial funding, will commence later this year.

EYE was fortunate to be given the exclusive opportunity to break the story ahead of all other media and our Newsflash alert generated a large read count and some vociferous comments from readers during the course of the day.

It must be said that there was a marked difference in reactions from those in the conference to those outside it, and in conversation during the day many delegates told me that they welcomed the new identity as a positive. The caveat was that it must be vigorously promoted to be a great success. It will be interesting to have those conversations again in a year’s time…

NAEA President David Mackie gave a presentation that introduced the NAEA board, welcomed the introduction of Propertymark and, fittingly, paid tribute to Peter Light, a highly regarded senior member of nearly 50 years standing in the Association, who died recently and is much missed by those who knew him – and there are many.

As if to underline the good standing of the NAEA in political circles, the first main speaker of the day was Housing Minister Gavin Barwell who gave a lucid, confident and optimistic speech on what is being planned, via this week’s White Paper, to fix the ‘broken’ housing market.

He acknowledged that he does not have a magic wand and that no single thing can fix all the problems overnight, but he is confident that the issue of under-supply of housing can be sorted.

Why is he so confident?

Because he says that we have built quantity before, in the postwar period; that public opinion and attitudes to building is changing (presumably by welcoming developments in their regions?); and, rather curiously, that when he looks at France he sees that they are building in quantity. This factor was rather lost on your correspondent, given that France is five times larger than the UK, has about the same number of people as the UK, and has a vast quantity of property up for sale at any time.

A question from the floor asked the minister if he would deliver the target of building one million new homes by 2020 and Mr Barwell – again with great confidence – assured us all that he will. So that’s sorted then.

A further question led to the minister being asked if he would introduce legislation to regulate the industry – to which he wondered if it was wanted.

When moderator Sally Bundock (host of the BBC Business Live programme) asked for a show of hands of those who would favour regulation there was a near 100% agreement – so, rather to his surprise, the minister was left in no doubt that such regulation is wanted, at least by those in the room.

Gavin Barwell was followed by a speaker from the Bank of England who opened his presentation by telling us that it was being given under the ‘Chatham House Rule’. This meant that it was not to be reported and your correspondent was superfluous for about half an hour and was able to have a quick nap – though not before noting that there were lots and lots and lots of graphs with lots and lots and lots of wiggly lines and that the man from the Bank seemed to know what they all meant.

The after-coffee speaker was Mark Palmer, a branding expert with a first-class track record at Green & Blacks (where he was in part responsible for growing turnover from £4m to £40m a year) and who is now marketing director at Pret a Manger.

His clear message, illustrated with real-world examples, was that there are innovative ways to build a business – not necessarily by advertising. In fact Pret does not advertise at all yet it grows its business and market share. Highly trained and motivated staff who are empowered to enhance the customer experience are a hugely valuable asset – and they consistently deliver quality goods and service to the customer.

It was then the turn of Miles Shipside, commercial director of Rightmove, to take the stage, from where he delivered a Valentine’s Day themed ‘love story’ that melted the hearts of the audience.

His delivery of statistics and research facts about the relationship between customers and agents left not a moist eye in the room, and his expert delivery, laced with puns and innuendo (Italian for pornography…), had many reaching for their handkerchiefs – possibly to stifle their laughter. On a more serious note, Miles showed stats indicating the ‘value’ vendors place on the services agents offer.

Given £100 to spend on the services of an agent, a vendor would use just £6 on an accurate valuation; £24 on the creation sales details; £16 on having accompanied viewings; £25 on promoting the property on Rightmove (natch!); £13 on offer negotiation; and just £8 on sales progression. To my eyes it just shows how little the public understands about what is really important in effecting a successful sale.

Lunch arrived in the form of rather mysterious black-lidded boxes containing small bowls of hot food. Unfortunately these arrived in dribs and drabs from the kitchens which were located just behind the Rightmove stand and so an enormous queue soon formed – all eager to grab some free grub courtesy of Rightmove – who had nowt to do with it.

The NAEA Propertymark team soon had things back on an even keel and I am delighted to report that the vegetarian option of spicy salad together with mushrooms in a creamy sauce was utterly delicious. (I’m not veggie but Mark Palmer had been talking about the success of Pret’s veggie offering and I guess he swayed my choice). The individual apple crumbles topped with cream and a pansy flower were as tasty as they were charming.

Into the afternoon session and if anyone fancied a nap they were not getting one as behaviour specialist Jez Rose leapt up on stage and in a whirlwind of wit took the place by storm.

I have sat through many a presentation from his ilk but I must say this was something really very special and entertaining. It moved with great pace and humour and carried a big message – that whilst we all strive to deliver exceptional customer service, the true magic of service is when it is delivered unexpectedly.

I wish I had the time and space to introduce you to Dr Moodio Bitchio, Mushers, and the Slybertron, but I can only say ‘you had to be there’ – and that you probably have at least one of each somewhere in your organisation.

Time for something completely different as Dr Kristian Niemietz from the Institute of Economic Affairs and Paul Miner from the Campaign for the Protection of Rural England battled it out over the question of whether building on the Green Belt is the answer to the housing crisis. You won’t be surprised that the former said ‘yes’ and the latter said ‘no’.

I particularly liked the analogy that people think of the Green Belt as like something out of Lord of the Rings (it isn’t) and that people think ‘sprawl’ is anything built after their own property was built (they do).

Grainne Gilmour, head of UK residential research at Knight Frank, gave one of her, as always, excellent presentations on the state of the market, noting that they expect a 14.2% increase in prices on average across the UK by 2021.

She also gave us the startling fact that back in the 1970s local authorities built about 50% of the new housing stock each year. Today, building firms are creating about as many homes as they did in the 70s – but the local authority building has of course disappeared.

It’s a shame Gavin Barwell wasn’t around to see that particular slide.

James Dearsely rounded off the day with his take on what is happening in the world of Proptech and Mark Hayward then ended the conference with the self-confessedly cheesy line of ‘I am Mark. Propertymark. Goodnight’.

This was a first-class event for the NAEA, in a superb venue.

Given that there were double the number of delegates from last year, plus a waiting list of exhibitors wanting to take stands, we can look forward to even bigger and better things from the ‘NAEA Propertymark’ conference in 2018.


Email the story to a friend


  1. AgentV

    There is absolutely no point the NAEA putting loads of effort in to promoting this when the  public’s main perception at the moment is that one member of the organisation very publicly rubbishes and ridicules the businesses and services of most of the other members. It makes everyone look unprofessional.

    Yesterday I had to explain to a potential vendor on a valuation that our favourite internet listers wouldn’t offer to sell their house for free like it said in the adverts!!!!!

    Managed to do it, and I have no doubt they will be selling through me when they are ready, but what about the rest of the general public out there …that are being deceived, and whom we don’t get to speak to. Unchecked this kind of advertising just portrays untrustworthiness of the whole industry;

    ‘They’re the ones with the new new logo ……but they’re  all as bad as one another aren’t they’








  2. smile please

    V is spot on what NAEA, propertymark should be doing is promoting full service agency. That is the difference they can make!

    Ironically I was out for lunch this week with a law firm partner and even they believed PB sold houses for free!!!


    1. AgentV

      Wonder if the local listing rep points out to vendors that it’s  not a free sale service ….before they sign?

  3. sb007ck

    I believe that after the next couple of weeks there will be very little heard of propertymark. The public will know nothing about it, and it will be a complete waste of time. No doubt the likes bricks and the Quirk brigard will be allowed to join anyway thus lessening its worth further.

    If the audience were wailing and clapping to the like or Barwell and Shipside, then clearly there were very few frontline estate agents in the room, as both these people have no interest in helping the housing market, just their own interests.

    Lastly i fail to see that NAEA is held in high regard in government circles when it is not consulted during any sort of policy changes, or the drafting of the housing white paper, just Barwell trying to make them feel good.

    Basically NAEA do something for your members rather than just banking our money. Do something to educate the public rather than bury your head in the sand as the call centre types publicly trash 99% of your members.

  4. Rivero

    I’d like to take this opportunity to put forward Mark Hayward’s name for Chairman of the English Football Association. He has all the right credentials: the ability to run outdated, out of touch and ineffective organisations. Successful candidates must also illustrate a cynical approach to it’s members, offering little in the way of support and advice…merely pay lip service and broadening bureaucracy.


    Frankly, the running (not the principle) of the NAEA has long been a disgrace! This will change nothing other than probably cost us more money having to change logos on our marketing material etc. The oft used phrase ‘not fit for purpose’ is ironically very fitting.


    The only reason it even exists still is that most of us are afraid to leave and be seen as anything less than 100% reputable – it’s a racket and it makes me sick.

  5. AgentV

    We may not like them, but you know what politicians do when they start to hear so many voices opposing what they are doing…they look to change it….for the sake of their CORE support….so why doesn’t the NAEA make a stand, come out and say that it does not approve of one member slating many of it’s other members? and if the rhetoric doesn’t stop it will expel that member? or are the extra fees it receives more important?

    1. Rivero

      That’s what they should do, but they won’t because they are toothless and irrelevant.


      They don’t do anything to benefit the average member…EVER!

      1. AgentV

        Unfortunately they perhaps will only sit up and listen, when the members start voting with their feet and leave. As they said themselves…. hardly any of the public is aware of their existence. I have not heard them mentioned in any conversation with vendors or buyers for over five years now….it simply means nothing to customers. I am not against the NAEA, by the way….I just don’t want to part of an organisation that allows other members to freely go out of their way to destroy my business and my livelihood.


  6. AgentV

    And I am very sorry NAEA but a brand new logo claiming to help customers to choose the best route in an industry, means nothing when it also represents two totally opposing factions who are at each others throats!!

  7. lettingsguru

    I’ve just received my new propertymark pack. I’d rather missed the point previously. Property Mark is the new name for all the NFoPP associations, and this is because it causes, “confusion for the public who do not readily identify with us and do not understand there is a two tier property market: those agents who belong to professional bodies and those who do not.” Says David Cox.

    I must be missing the point (again), how does changing my branding to ARLA propertymark (and all the cost and agro that goes with it) help cause less confusion to the public, when previously I was just ARLA, only now I’m confused!

    Oh, and we still use “post-nominals” of MARLA or FARLA!!!!!!!!!!!!


  8. smile please

    Come on Mark Haywood.

    You are great at addressing the your “Boys club” members at over inflated pointless, back slapping conferences.

    You must have seen yesterday and todays comments as you do allocate a marketing budget to PIE

    Why not come on here and answer some of the questions?

    The full service industry is crying out to be led by something / someone. Why not make yourself relevant and address the problems?

    Its got so bad a bl00dy software seller is looking to fill the void you have created.

    You have a fantastic membership base BUILD ON IT!!!!!


You must be logged in to report this comment!

Comments are closed.

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.