Law Society postpone TA6 form – PLAG responds

The Law Society announced the ‘postponement’ of its controversial Fifth edition of the ‘TA6’ form last Friday.

The TA6 is based on the National Trading Standards Estate and Letting Agency Team’s guidance on Material Information, which is not legally binding on estate agents (MI).

The Law Society said:

“For many members of the public, specialist conveyancing solicitors and their teams are the face of the legal profession, ensuring that hundreds of thousands of home moves can take place annually,” said Law Society of England and Wales chief executive officer Ian Jeffery.

“Conveyancing work is at the heart of a larger buying and selling process for homes and that process is undergoing long term change, driven by technological advances and public policy.

“As a profession we must embrace change and a key role of the Society is to support our members through this evolution.

“In this vein, the recent updates made to our TA6 form were intended as a pragmatic response to the National Trading Standards Estate and Letting Agency Team (NTSELAT) guidance on material information. We know that many firms have been gearing up to go live with the new form, with thousands of copies having already been accessed.

“However, we have listened to recent feedback and recognise that we have not yet persuaded enough of our colleagues on those particular changes, so we need to do more to communicate with the profession about them. Having reflected on the strength of feeling expressed by members on this issue we have this week decided to postpone compulsory implementation of the TA6 Property Information Form (5th edition) (2024) for accredited CQS members for six months while we consult members further.

“To clarify, for the period until 15 January 2025 members will be compliant with our Conveyancing Quality Scheme (CQS) if they use either TA6 (4th edition, second revision) (2020) or if they use the new TA6 Property Information Form (5th edition) (2024).

“In the coming weeks we will consult members further about the content of the TA6 5th edition to ensure we understand the full range of member views. In the meantime, we know some members are using the new form or readying themselves to do so, and we would encourage them to continue in that way.”

The Property Lawyers Action Group (PLAG) responded last night to Friday’s announcement by the Law Society regarding the postponement of the ‘TA6’.

PLAG considers the announcement disappointing for several reasons. In particular:

+ How could the Law Society’s approach to MI be predicated on ‘pragmatism’ when its implementation would have far-reaching civil and criminal legal consequences for both the public and solicitors?

+ The Law Society has not appreciated the full extent of members’ anger over the lack of transparency concerning the adoption by the Law Society of MI.

+ Angry members expected therefore the TA6 to be withdrawn, not merely ‘postponed’.

+ PLAG considers it curious that the LS should suggest in the announcement that: ‘until 15 January 2025 members will be compliant with the CQS if they use either TA6 (4th edition, second revision) (2020) or if they use the new TA6’ Property Information Form (5th edition) (2024), Jeffery said’ This would imply the Law Society has already made up its mind.

+ PLAG considers the Law Society’s Announcement unfortunately to be condescending, especially as one solicitor has remarked for
instance, that he felt like his own representative body, had declared war on its own members.

What next?

PLAG says at the centre of the controversy regarding the TA6 is the need for transparency, so the Law Society’s actions become much more pellucid.

Equally, there needs to be a real debate with its members, regarding their relationship with law tech in 2024.

PLAG is carefully considering its next steps concerning the Special General Meeting.

Stephen Larcombe, chair of PLAG remarks: “That bearing in mind the numerous objections sent to the Law Society concerning the TA6 and the MI policy that underpins it, by PLAG, various local law societies and members individually, it is a pity that the Law Society left PLAG with little choice but to initiate the arrangements for an SGM.”



Email the story to a friend!


  1. Mrlondon52

    Emabarrased that our industry gets down to arguing like children in a playground.

    We can’t even roll a new form out!?

  2. Shaun Adams

    What percentage of UK conveyancers are in PLAG?

    1. Rob Hailstone

      Not sure Shaun, but pretty low I would guess, they keep their membership names and numbers secret.

  3. aSalesAgent

    Glad to see the conveyancers were able to work together to force a rethink of that ridiculous version of the TA6.

  4. Anna Naemis

    Firstly let me begin by saying I am not particularly a fan of PLAG, I find them overly confrontational and aggressive in tone and approach, and am not sure that is the way Property Lawyers should be painted. That said, I also think their approach is indicative of the way frustrated property professionals now almost feel they need to behave to get noticed, and get their point across. Look on social media, the talking heads who seem to have the largest profiles tend to be the biggest blowhards and bs-ers, but that seems to be the way to get followers nowadays, and to get one’s views into the public consciousness. Very disappointingly for the majority of us.

    Years and years of no leadership at the Law Society has however brought us to where we are. Some of the points PLAG make are very valid, some are questionable and, as is the case with other acronyms purporting to speak for all conveyancers, they do not. What they have done is take up the mantle of a frustrated profession ignored once too often, and they are a creation of our times as such. And if they can get some changes made, and stop the influence of the insidious Conveyancing Association who are the biggest threat to conveyancing at this time, then conveyancers will support them, as can be seen on other social media sites.

    For those of us who have been in the profession for many years it is just another reason to think about retirement. All very unseemly and not really solving any of the real problems in conveyancing. Hard to see where it all ends, but I dread to think where the profession will be in five years, assuming it survives that long whilst being pulled in all directions without a head.


You must be logged in to report this comment!

Comments are closed.

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.