Joint open letter: PRS jeopardised by tenancy reforms

The Scottish government has been warned that the supply of homes for rent – particularly in rural Scotland – may be irreparably damaged by proposed new legislation.

Scottish Land & Estates, the Scottish Association of Landlords and NFU Scotland have penned a joint letter to the Scottish government urging it to change course when it comes to the PRS north of the border.

They fear that the tenancy proposals contained within the Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill could lead to thousands of homes being lost to the rental market.

The organisations have written to the Scottish Government ahead of a Stage 1 debate on the Bill in parliament on Thursday 12 May.

During the Covid-19 pandemic, all grounds for eviction of a tenant were temporarily made discretionary. This Bill seeks to make this change permanent and a tribunal would be asked to rule on a landlord’s desire to remove a tenant and reclaim vacant possession.

In effect, a tribunal will not have to automatically remove people, even where the tenant fails to comply with the conditions set out in their tenancy agreement, including non-payment of rent.

It would also be up to a tribunal to rule whether possession of a property could be regained in the case of a landlord wanting to live in the property, from a tenant who is no longer an employee or when the owner wishes to sell the property.

The proposed changes in law would have an impact on all types of landlords – whether they own a single property or multiple homes they let out and could lead to a substantial loss in the value of a property where a landlord could not regain vacant possession.

The organisations have raised concerns raised concerns that these far-reaching proposals are being introduced through the Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill rather than through a Housing Bill that would be subject to full parliamentary scrutiny.

The measures appear to go far beyond the public health rationale contained in other elements of the bill – and the issues trying to be solved are far from clearly defined. The Scottish Government recently published its Scottish Household Survey 2020 which showed that 94% of households in the PRS were very or fairly satisfied.

Added to this, rather than reduce burden on public services and reduce workload for the tribunal, this will make an already lengthy process even longer.

Open letter: 

Mr John Swinney MSP
Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Covid Recovery

The Scottish Government

St Andrew’s House

Regent Road

Edinburgh EH1 3DG

Dear Deputy First Minister

Joint open letter: Part four, Coronavirus (Recovery & Reform) (Scotland) Bill

The Scottish Government’s plans to supposedly give housing tenants facing eviction greater protection is in grave danger of ruining the muchneeded supply of homes for rent.

Instead of safeguarding the wider interests of tenants, what is more likely to happen is that a great many properties will be withdrawn from the market and sold at a time when there is a pressing need for rental homes.

At the height of the Covid19 pandemic, there was a moratorium on evictions, except in special circumstances approved by a tribunal. Landlords understood this as a measure to deal with an unprecedented emergency. This Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) Bill seeks to make this change permanent and a tribunal would be asked to rule on every instance where a landlord has legitimate reasons for ending a tenancy, including nonpayment of rent.

For those landlords who want to sell their rental property perhaps to fund retirement or to free up capital to invest in other areas of businesses then not being able to end the tenancy will significantly reduce the value. Property professionals estimate that this could crush the value of a property by up to 50%.

Our organisations represent landlords of all types, from owners of single buytolet properties to people who run letting businesses in urban and rural areas. We cannot believe that the outcome sought by the government is a situation where tenants will find it harder to rent due to a reduction in supply and landlords face increased rent arrears or a substantial loss in the value of their properties.

We are also deeply concerned that such farreaching proposals are being introduced through the Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill rather than through a Housing Bill that would be subject to full parliamentary scrutiny. The Scottish Parliament’s Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee agreed with the Scottish Government that it would be easier to make temporary powers permanent than wait for separate bill but this smacks of playing fast and loose with emergency legislation and there is widespread concern about the government’s desire to retain emergency powers that are not needed as normal times resume.

The government and committee’s suggestion that stopping these emergency measures would cause confusion is at best spurious and at worst deliberately dishonest. We believe that the Scottish Government is misusing Covid legislation to push through housing elements of the agreement between the SNP and Scottish Greens.

Given increasing interest rates and the costofliving crisis, the need for rental properties is essential and any measure that is detrimental to the provision of rental properties needs very careful consideration. The impact on the housing supply appears to have either been
dismissed or viewed as acceptable fallout to deliver the Minister Patrick Harvie’s continued attack on private landlords.

We urge Scottish Ministers to think again and take on board the genuine concerns of all those who not only own and let properties but tenants who need a place to live.

Yours sincerely

SarahJane Laing
Chief Executive

Scottish Land & Estates

John Blackwood
Chief Executive

Scottish Association of

Martin Kennedy

NFU Scotland



Email the story to a friend


  1. MickRoberts

    They never go and ask the hundreds of thousands of Benefit tenants why they can’t get a house.

    If they did and found out why by coming to ask us the Landlords, they would actually be relaxing the rules to increase supply which will reduce rents and improve conditions. How can they keep getting it so wrong.

    Cause they in a cycle of Ooh must protect that naughty tenant who’s being evicted, we’ll worry about the thousand other tenants who now can’t get a house cause we’ve stopped this landlord having his house back.

    1. undercover agent

      They also want any excuse to tax and charge landlords, even if they know it hurts tenants.

  2. Woodentop

    Any state making it unlawful for the owner of property to regain their property that has been leased on a short term contract which has expired, should be made illegal activity by any government. It is a fundamental right of the individuals ownership under common law.


    On the other hand if they want to make it illegal for a property owner to get their property back, then the responsibility of the property has been transferred to the tenant and all that comes with it ……. repairs, maintenance, all costs and legal liabilities!

    1. undercover agent

      It feels like people have forgotten why they ever had property rights in the first place. They act like property rights have no benefit and are some kind of historic throwback we can live without. Maybe we should blame the education system for not teaching enough history?



You must be logged in to report this comment!

Comments are closed.

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.