
Awareness of the Renters’ Rights Act is high – but understanding of what it will actually change in practice remains low across the lettings sector.
New research from LRG shows that 44% of landlords and 64% of tenants say they are not confident about what the legislation will mean once it comes into force, despite widespread recognition of the reforms.
The findings, published in LRG’s latest Lettings Report and based on a survey of landlords and tenants across England and Wales, highlight a clear gap between awareness and comprehension. While the Act is intended to reshape parts of the rental market and strengthen tenant protections, many respondents appear uncertain about how the changes will be implemented day-to-day.
Only 5% of landlords describe themselves as “very confident” in their understanding of the reforms, with most falling into the “not very” or “somewhat” confident categories. Among tenants, confidence is even lower: just 9% say they are very confident, and only around a quarter feel fairly confident overall.
The results suggest that, although the legislation has been widely discussed, its practical implications are still not fully landing with those most affected. For tenants—who the reforms are designed to benefit through greater security and stronger rights—the level of uncertainty is particularly pronounced, raising questions about how effectively the changes have been communicated ahead of implementation.
When asked about their biggest concerns around the transition, landlords and tenants highlight very different pressures.
Nearly half of landlords (48%) say their main worry is losing control over outcomes, reflecting unease about how periodic tenancies could affect their ability to manage and plan around their properties.
For tenants, affordability sits at the top of the list, cited by 50%, while 41% also say they are concerned about navigating and understanding the new processes.
Despite being affected by the same set of reforms, the findings suggest the two groups are interpreting the changes through very different lenses, with each focused on distinct risks as the legislation approaches implementation.



