High-profile money laundering case exposes ‘huge gaps’ in AML

Some companies may not be applying adequate customer due diligence measures when carrying out estate agency work, it has been suggested.

As you undoubtedly know, almost all businesses, including estate agents, are supervised by HMRC, which took over the regulatory duty in April 2014 from the OFT, for anti-money laundering (AML) purposes, which requires agents to conduct thorough due diligence checks on both the buyers and sellers of properties.

But following the news that a Leeds businessman has been found to be laundering £10m through property deals, Martin Cheek, managing director at anti-money laundering experts SmartSearch, is concerned that there may be major holes in protection against money laundering in the property industry.

He implies that some agents may not be establishing and maintaining appropriate policies and procedures on adequate record-keeping, internal controls or risk assessments, whilst ensuring that relevant employees are trained in how to recognise and deal with transactions and other activities potentially related to money laundering and terrorist financing.

He commented: “The case of Mansoor Mahmood Hussain, known as ‘Manni’, clearly demonstrates the huge gaps in protection against money laundering that exist in the property market, through which criminals are able to pour millions of pounds a year.

“It also highlights, again, that while some may think financial crime is ‘victimless’ because it involves moving cash through property and banks, the reality is that it funds some of the despicable criminal activity in the country.

“That just one man was able to amass such an amount of wealth through illicit property deals shows how widespread the problem is if you multiply that across the number of criminals involved in this activity across the country and the rest of the world. But despite the threat from money laundering criminals being higher than ever before, the fact is it has never been simpler for companies to protect themselves and carry out the most basic checks, electronically, which would stop it at the front door.”

Homesearch EOS

Email the story to a friend


  1. NickTurner

    Unless the rules have been tightened I understand residential builders with their own sales departments do not have to be registered for AML purposes and so do not have to carry out checks on buyers. If that building company has its own in house conveyancing team then presumably money could be laundered without any checks?

  2. Robert_May

    HMRC, MHCLG and  NTSEAT  don’t seem to be too interested in actual solutions even when they’re offered them, presumably the last hang overs of them and us government hasn’t quite transitioned into the devolved  profit centre governance in quite the way it should have.

    Having a viable business unit that covers its costs  is hard enough but harder still is paying  executive salaries on par with a civil service pay scale.


    Hey ho, an efficient system of fining the private sector fills the income gap even if it doesn’t resolve the core issues


You must be logged in to report this comment!

Comments are closed.

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.