Rishi Sunak’s decision to extend the furlough scheme until the end of March has been welcomed by a number of struggling businesses, but others are not so happy.

The chancellor yesterday confirmed further extensions of the furlough and self-employed support schemes, enabling many businesses, including a number of property firms, to maintain their staff during the uncertain months ahead.

Rishi Sunak

In a major U-turn by the government, Sunak said the move is needed because of the economic situation caused by the coronavirus crisis.

The chancellor, who is desperate “to give businesses security through the winter”, in order to “protect millions of jobs”, confirmed that the scheme will pay up to 80% of a person’s wage up to £2,500 a month.

He told the Commons that the government will review the policy in January.

However, Sunak has been criticised for announcing yet another extension only a matter of days after announcing the November extension.

Richard Churchill, business advisory partner at Blick Rothenberg, said: “Continual extension and modification does little to suggest the chancellor has a clear plan for the UK economy.”

He added: “The furlough extension is welcomed and finally the Chancellor is providing some longer-term measures in respect of England’s four-week lockdown. However, it would have made more sense to extend the furlough scheme for three months in the first place to give businesses certainty, given the critical winter and festive period.”

Churchill believes that the chancellor should have gone further and announced that the furlough scheme will be in place until June 2021 or even December 2021, although accepts that he can of course review and amend the scheme eligibility and assistance on a monthly basis.

Richard Churchill

He added: “The extension of the furlough scheme has come at a cost for some employers who have been counting on the Job Retention Scheme Bonus.

“For those businesses that have redesigned their businesses and may not be utilising the furlough scheme going forward but had accounted for the Job Retention Scheme Bonus this is a further change and blow to cashflow they will have to remodel quickly.

“This is yet another example of reactive changes by the chancellor causing difficulty for UK business. Surely those businesses not accessing the current furlough scheme should still have been eligible for the Job Retention Scheme Bonus.”

The chancellor has provided little assistance to businesses struggling with funding, according to Churchill.

Whilst the application dates or CBILS and bounce back loans have been extended to 31 January many businesses have already exhausted the scheme with its limit of £50,000 in exiting the first lockdown.

He continued: “We are now in a second wave of the virus and businesses will require additional funding to provide working capital to exit this lockdown. The availability and funding limit of these loans need to be reviewed and increased to provide businesses with additional access to finance in order they can fund their businesses out of this second lockdown.

“Once again there was no detail provided on the successor loan scheme announced by the Chancellor in his winter statement some weeks ago and whether this will provide the answers to the funding crisis facing businesses.

“It would also have been good to hear from the Chancellor his plans for business rates in 2021 as clearly those businesses in the most effected sectors primarily hospitality, leisure and entertainment need further relief in order to be viable.”