Unite considers legal options against Goodlord for ‘unfair’ dismissal of workers

Unite, the union, says it is considering all legal option against Goodlord following what it sees as the ‘unfair’ dismissal of striking workers last week.

More than 20 members of Unite, employed in Goodlord’s referencing department, began strike action on 22 February over ‘fire and rehire’ contract changes that resulted in annual pay falling from £24,000 to £18,000, which is less than the London living wage of £21,157.

Meanwhile, while their maternity, holiday and sick pay would also be cut. But Goodlord believe that they should now only be required to pay UK real living wage, despite the fact that the workers are based in the capital.

The original contracts for around half of the striking workers expired during the strike action,

The remaining half of the workers voted to commence strike action over these dismissals and other new matters in a further ballot which closed on 26 April.

The new strikes called for Goodlord to reverse the dismissals, halt its hostile targeting of union members and use of agency labour to undermine the industrial action and award a pay rise for 2021.

Last week, Goodlord dismissed the remaining nine workers, claiming that they had chosen to reject a ‘range of options’ to end the dispute put forward by the company during talks with the conciliation service ACAS.

Unite said the workers were within the 12-week protected period provided by the 26 April ballot and were dismissed for an ‘automatically unfair reason’.

The union also refuted Goodlord’s account of the ACAS talks, saying that the company refused to negotiate and instead issued an ultimatum for staff to return to work or leave with pay in lieu of notice.

Unite regional officer Steve O’Donnell said: “Unite is considering all our legal options to response to the firing of our members by Goodlord. They were within the 12-week protected period provided by the 26 April 2021 ballot and as such have been dismissed for an automatically unfair reason.

“Goodlord’s leadership has behaved disgracefully from day one of this dispute. They have used the pandemic to opportunistically cut wages by £6,000 and told impacted staff they can survive on the poverty wages by moving out of London and working from home. They have brought in scab workers and hostilely targeted striking staff. They have pretended to join negotiations under Acas and then issued more unacceptable ultimatums.

“When none of these tactics worked, Goodlord fired its workers for having the temerity to push back against wage cuts that would have made living in London all but impossible. I pay tribute to our members for refusing to give into Goodlord’s demands and send an unequivocal message to the company that this fight is far from over.”

A spokesperson from Goodlord issued a statement last night.

The spokesperson told EYE: “We are deeply saddened that we could not reach a resolution with these colleagues, despite spending hundreds of hours before, during and after this strike working to find a solution. This included us approaching ACAS directly to hold conciliation talks. We put forward a range of options and explored every viable way of reaching a resolution.

“Unfortunately, none of the options put forward were taken up by the nine individuals involved and, as these colleagues weren’t prepared to return to work after the 12 weeks of continuous action had come to an end, we had to take the heartbreaking decision to end their employment.

“These were temporary staff who were offered permanent roles with us. We wanted them to be part of our business. This decision was therefore made as a very last resort.”

 

Goodlord staff have employment terminated over ‘fire and rehire’ dispute

x

Email the story to a friend!



One Comment

  1. AcornsRNuts

    It is legal to dismiss all striking employees and that is what seems to have happened here. As for the phrase “scab workers” I thought the unions had matured beyond name calling. Phrases like that are the reason many people no longers support Labour who are seen as in the pocket of the unions.

    Report
X

You must be logged in to report this comment!

Comments are closed.

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.