The pilot Right to Rent scheme has been branded a failure – according to the Government’s own data.
The scheme, which involves the mandatory checking of tenants’ immigration status, is due to be rolled out shortly – possibly from as early as this autumn.
The national roll-out has been announced even though the pilot scheme running in the west midlands since last December has yet to be officially evaluated.
However, a Freedom of Information request has shown that in the pilot area, just seven landlords have been penalised, in relation to 11 tenants.
In the pilot scheme, there are civil – not criminal – penalties of up to £3,000.
However, the seven so far fined in the west midlands paid fines averaging just £782. Of the money owed, totalling £5,480, just £1,720 has so far been paid.
A further two landlords are “currently under consideration for a civil penalty”, according to the Home Office.
In the impending national roll-out, the penalties become criminalised, with jail sentences of up to five years.
Landlords or their agents would also be expected to evict tenants abruptly on notification by the Home Office that the tenant no longer has the right to be in the UK.
In further concerns about the success, or otherwise, of the west midlands trial, other research has claimed that only half of prospective tenants were asked by a landlord or their agent if they had permission to be in the UK.
A mystery shopping exercise suggested that landlords and agents in the region have taken the easy way out, with non-Britons blocked from renting properties on 11 out of 27 occasions.
A Home Office spokesperson said: “The evaluation of Right to Rent is currently being completed, but there are no indications so far to suggest landlord checks are being carried out unfairly.
“Right to Rent is not designed to be a money-making scheme or to catch out honest landlords. Instead, we want to help landlords carry out the proper checks so that those who do not have the right to be in the UK cannot access rented accommodation.
“We do not recognise figures suggesting only half of landlords checked potential tenants’ right to rent.”
Not that I agree with “Right to Rent”, but how does the number of fines define if it is a failure?
What we need to know is how many people that are not allowed to be in the UK, found it much harder to rent due to landlords/agents doing the checks…
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
Quite. It would also be good to know how many people were refused their rental application because they failed on the Right to Rent test, rather than not being considered at all simply because they were not British.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
This is all a bit like the Home Buyer Packs which wasted millions of pounds to introduce and was then largely dropped. Thousands of individual paid for their training to provided home packs and their training costs have been their personal loss. The trial is said to have failed so why would you introduce it nationwide? Because it was always the intention and the figures will be massaged by government to justify it. Of course it gives an incentive to rent to a UK national to avoid the risk of making a potential mistake that you could make with a foreign national
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register