A reviewer of Purplebricks, who has received an email from allAgents querying whether her review of Purplebricks is genuine, says that an identical assessment is on Trustpilot – where only reviews from verified customers appear.
Joanne Buckley received a note from Martin McKenzie of allAgents which says: “Purplebricks has flagged up your review amongst others as being a fake review.
“In order to combat this allegation, we are asking customers if they could forward us something that supports your relationship with them. Examples could be an email, letter, contract etc.
“Would you be able to assist us by providing this information?”
Last week, allAgents first took down 71 reviews from its site after they were challenged. It has since removed the Purplebricks page altogether.
However, Buckley has told EYE that the challenged review on allAgents was exactly the same as one that she posted up on Trustpilot on September 26 last year.
She said she cut and pasted the review to post up an identical version on allAgents.
Her one-star review can still be seen on Trustpilot.
https://uk.trustpilot.com/users/57e985d80000ff000a47f94d
We have given Purplebricks the opportunity to comment.
Separately, we also asked Trustpilot about the rating carried on its site about allAgents, where it has earned two stars; and also the difference in how the ‘calls to action’ on Google are phrased in allAgents and Purplebricks (see the screengrabs below).
A spokesperson for Trustpilot told us: “At Trustpilot we operate an ‘Open Platform’, that means a consumer is free to review any business if they’ve had a service or purchase experience, including businesses that do not yet have a Trustpilot profile and that includes review sites.
“There are currently over 180,000 businesses reviewed on Trustpilot.”
In response to our second question, the spokesperson said: “The brief call to action text displayed on the Google page varies according to the current Tustpilot rating the company has.
“The reason for the difference you’ve identified is that Purplebricks UK currently has a five-star rating and allAgents has a two-star rating.
“The call to action is different for each of the possible star ratings between 1 and 5. However, it is the same for all businesses, e.g. the text is the same for all businesses with say a two-star rating.”
Surely AllAgents must be finished as a review site.
Removing a valid review because a company threatens legal action.
AllAgents and any other review site needs a business model which validates for authenticity as part of their procedures in the same way that TrustPilot does. Just showing 1 of their reviews is valid doesn’t do that. However showing that one of the reviews is invalid makes them liable to being sued.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
OH, BEHAVE, will you!
You know the background – stop spinning it like a demented Tasmanian Devil.
We know that howwible people are telling you that your schoolboy crush is a bad’un and you don’t like it. AND you’ve got competition for Bestest #Fanboy status as well with domboy beating you so far by a twitching nose in the #bunnyboiler stakes, so you’re thinking every little helps – ‘cos Tesco says so and you believe every word that every company says on their adverts, don’t you?.
But the bottom of the barrel is not the place to scrape for good ideas, ducky. All you have found there so far is detritus – the stuff that’s not even solid enough to form **** – and you’re now harvesting the very worst of that.
You need to up your game, Sir.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/www.purplebricks.com
They are still at it despite announcing the fact it has been dealt with the 5* reviews still arrivng thick and fast from the UK boosting the rating but funny enough the 1* ones are disappearing!
You have to question both Pilot and Bricks here.Pilot have the database of home addresses of the reviewers They can distinguish UK from USA and instantly remove.
Bricks have indicated a computer glitch How on earth can Californians be confident that their houses arent being marketed in Clitheroe Very amateurish
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
>:You have to question both Pilot and Bricks here.Pilot have the database of home addresses of the reviewers They can distinguish UK from USA and instantly remove.
You could then be removing genuine reviewers of PB USA.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
Cybs You cant be serious How is Dave who lives in Clitheroe ,lancs praising his LPE be a genuine reviewer in Los Angeles .The clue is in the reviewers address held on their database
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
Hillofwad71,
I just sold a property in the U.S. and my address is in the UK.
Try and put yourself in the shoes of TrustPilot, they can’t just start removing reviews based on the address of the reviewer.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
“Try and put yourself in the shoes of TrustPilot, they can’t just start removing reviews based on the address of the reviewer.”
Oh, ducky – what have I told you about the stuff at the bottom of that barrel?
Have a read of THIS Purplebricks United States of America (USA) ‘review’ – posted SEVEN HOURS ago and as yet unchallenged (but there are two others as old as TWENTY ONE HOURS):
https://uk.trustpilot.com/reviews/59c9bcaed2c87503046183ce
Maybe – just maybe – the title gives the merest of a hintlet to TrustlessPilot, to PB UK, USA and wherever – and to the rest of the civilised world that take no 5h!t from anyone, for that matter:
“on selling my house in Forest Green, surrey England”
No doubt you’ll be scouring that barrel bottom for a response, ducky…
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
how convenient that you have just sold a property in the good old US of A, always have an answer don’t you !!!!!
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
“I just sold a property in the U.S. and my address is in the UK.”
Is that right, ducky?
Funny – you’ve never brought that into conversation before now.
I would have thought that someone as analytical as you would want to draw a web of comparisons between your ‘experiences’ on the US Real Estate market to that of your arduous slog on the UK side of the pond.
Makes me wonder why…
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
After all the comments from TrustPilot last week about a technical error in the reviews being posted to the wrong site, amazed to still see reviews being posted today from uk clients, this is absolute bull kaka , why have they not turned the link off, it is a simple step and would immediately stop this happening, obviously they still want to keep the reviews flowing to build momentum. I hope they realise that the American authorities don’t do ” informally resolved ” they do ” stick your ass in Jail “
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
Look at the last one posted – FOURTEEN HOURS AGO.
It is entitled
on selling my house in Forest Green, surrey england
Why on earth would someone add the word ‘england’ if they didn’t think it was entirely necessary?
Like, for instance, might they do that if they were fully aware that the ‘review’ was being used in, say, another CONTINENT…??
Oh – and it should also be mentioned that the poster has previously given the company a glowing 5-star review on the UK site… SIX WEEKS AGO…
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
cyberduck46 – Are you the cyberduck poster on Purplebricks Share Chat on London South East?
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
Yes, that’s me.
And before you ask, no I don’t own shares but I do follow developments very closely because I am an investor and have owned shares in the past.
Hillofwad71, who has been a long time poster on lse, would be able to vouch for the consistency of my statements between here, there (lse) and in private communication with him.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
That story is embarrassing. In my opinion it epitomises all that is wrong with the passive intermediary internet listing industry; taking a fee from vendors in negative equity, giving them false hope and expectation with negligent advice then threatening litigation to recover the listing loan they were unaware they’d taken out.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
Yet you were supportive of the traditional Agent when they collected £4000 from the old lady who sold her property to her son after the agent had failed to sell for 18 months.
http://www.propertyindustryeye.com/elderly-woman-charged-agents-commission-after-property-failed-to-sell-allegation/
Your comment “If there is a contractual reason why the client should pay I’m not aware of an upper age limit that says anyone can dip out of their responsibility because they’re old.”
I knew there’d be some hypocrisy further down the line when I bookmarked that one. 🙂
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
Bit of a sad life, bookmarking ‘That’ Robert May’s comments just to use at a later date.
How is you house sale going Ducky? – Not exchanged yet? Why is that? been in hand a while …….
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
smile please,
What is really sad is what is going on here with all the hypocrisy and bias.
People reporting online Agents to ASA when they are themselves misleading people on their own websites etc. etc.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
‘when they are themselves misleading people on their own websites etc. etc’
Links, evidence or retraction. Your choice.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
Well noted CyberDuck the hypocrisy here has no bounds.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
I might be a hypocrite but I am not deliberately or negligently misleading people. I am not breaching CPR’s, BPRs or misleading investors with false claims and promises. I’ve never listed properties owned by relatives to inflate my register. Never portaljuggled, never undersold a property to any connected person, never been in front of a disciplinary committee, and never lied on national radio.
You might consider me a hypocrite but if that is all you’ve got on me, congratulations!
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
>I might be a hypocrite but I am not deliberately or negligently misleading people.
But you are Robert.
You are misleading people with your hypocrisy.
All that nonsense about portaljuggling and meetings with Trading standards was also misleading in that people reading the comments on here would have thought there was going to be some national scandal involving Trading Standards.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
95% of what was going on has stopped. What James Munro and Rob Brown do or don’t do isn’t something I can control. All I can do is provide evidence of what I have observed and continue to observe an allow them to do what they are paid to do; enforce compliance of CPR and BPRs
Just because you don’t like it doesn’t make it hypocrisy.
I have only ever posted what I know to be correct and can evidence. That might be inconvenient for people who want to claim they complete on more transactions than they do or claim to achieve a higher % of asking price by using very selective data, but fact are facts.
Let me ask you some closed questions
Is a negotiator with an NVQ in public service and a total of 3 months estate agency training qualified enough to be considered an expert estate agent?
Would someone living in Chester be considered to be local to the Wirral?
Is a 50% share of a flat worth the same as 100%
Will a property being marketed at 166% of realistic market value attract any interest?
Is it morally right to take money from someone you know has no realistic chance of achieving a sale based on advice you expertly know to be incorrect?
Even with your zealous,sycophantic defence of Purplebricks I really doubt you could seriously justify a yes answer to any of those questions. (I am fairly certain you’ll try to justify all 5)
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
Wouldn’t be a show without Punch – would it.
Punch drunk, some might say…
But this proves inconclusively that there’s room at the bottom of the barrel for two – even if there’s nothing there of use nor ornament.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
Nothing on topic to say as usual PeeBee.
Don’t expect a reply you’ve wasted enough of my time.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
OI! I wasn’t actually referring to you, dippy ducky!
At least try to keep up, won’t you…
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
there is a bit of a difference between the two cases, in one instance there was a contract that complied with the agent’s legal duty of care and skill. The agent exercised care and skill, fulfilled their obligation under the contract and so the fee was due.
In this case a woman with virtually no experience or relevant qualification mislead the principal by marketing a property at 166% of its open market value. There is case law precedent that an agent should exercise proper care and skill, if they don’t they waive their rights to a fee and are liable for any losses by the client.
An NVQ in public service plus 3 months as a trainee negotiator is in no way qualification to claim expert status. Failing to realise a shared equity property has a limited market is naive. Failing to divide the online algorithm guess at value by 2 to account for the 50/50 ownership fails to provide the principal with a duty of care and skill.
Taking money from anyone with no realistic chance of fulfilling the outcome the client is expecting is deceitful.
As I said the epitome of all that is wrong with passive intermediaries passing themselves off as estate agents
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
>The agent exercised care and skill, fulfilled their obligation under the contract and so the fee was due.
You really don’t know whether they exercised due care and skill. You just assume that all traditional agents do. You seem oblivious to what homeowners are telling the industry. Estate Agents are not trusted.
Robert, you are not qualified and even objective enough (now proven) to determine whether any case law applies.
Do you even know that what the woman is claiming is completely true? Just because it’s not a fake review doesn’t mean it’s a fully factual account.
Assuming that the account is fully factual then does this influence your objectivity in connection with other reviews?When you look at TrustPilot reviews do you think that all the positive ones are fake and all the negative ones aren’t? Do you imagine that all the customers who haven’t provided feedback do so because they’ve had a bad experience?
The number of bad TrustPilot reviews is really very small considering they have now had over 80,000 customers (I’ve guessed conservatively at 20,000 since the end of the last financial year) in the last 3 1/2 years. I know you probably think (or would like people to believe) that there are thousands of negative reviews that have been removed but just look at the motivation from the reviewer above. She’s even posted on two websites. It is typical for people who are upset to go to great lengths to get some revenge against somebody they consider to have treated them wrongly so I just don’t buy these arguments put forward here and I have been around a bit. I was there when it was all happening in the internet marketing world (when TrustPilot were founded) back in 2007 and earlier. I’ve seen the makeup of reviews before companies were able to flag them as suspicious and it wasn’t a pretty site. Multiple negative reviews by disgruntled customers and multiple fake reviews by competitors. Completely worthless as is the case with any review system that doesn’t allow validation.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
“Do you even know that what the woman is claiming is completely true? Just because it’s not a fake review doesn’t mean it’s a fully factual account.”
She’s in your neck of the woods – how about I put you in touch with her? You can climb out of the barrel and have a nice Purple chat.
I’m pretty darn sure she will convince you that her review is a fully factual account of her ‘experience’.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
I have an exam pass and certificate that says I am! I’ve still got and refer to the course reading list.
If the public distrust estate agents so much why are passive intermediary internet listers so determined to aspire to be recognised as estate agents?
If passive intermediary internet listing is so much better than estate agency wouldn’t it be better to have that as a USP? We are not estate agents, you can trust us!
You can trust us to put your home on the internet listing sites
You can trust us to chase you for your listing fee whether your home sells or not.
Sorry I’ve run out of things the sector delivers, what else can consumers trust passive intermediary, estate agency don’t wannabes to deliver for just over £1000 average?
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
What??? Customers now publically having to voice their frustration in the media because it’s been suppressed on an independent review site???? This doesn’t look good at all for Purplebricks.
This is like a really bad smell for Purplebricks, it’s going to linger on and on and on……
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
https://uk.trustpilot.com/users/598d77180000ff000aba4c21
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
What happened to Chris Dale?
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
Nothing – just works in a DIFFERENT COUNTY.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
support@trustpilot.com makes interesting reading
it really is a guide on juggling, as we have witnessed it seems to be much more tailored towards how to make your company look good by carefully managing reviews
personally I see very little that would allow me to retain much trust in the reviews that I am reading
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register