Renters will pay the price of Labour’s ‘anti-landlord’ tax, says Purplebricks boss

Sam Mitchell

The new government has been criticised for its anti-landlord rhetoric and bias with new legislation and likely tax hikes in this month’s Budget that will cost renters dear.

Purplebricks chief executive, Sam Mitchell, criticised Labour’s anticipated capital gains tax (CGT) raid which could force landlords to pay thousands of pounds more on the sale of their properties, and believes that tenants and first-time buyers will in turn end up paying more for property.

Mitchell told The Telegraph that landlords will flee the private rented sector if chancellor Rachel Reeves presses ahead with anticipated tax hikes in the Budget later this month.

The Purplebricks boss said: “If you put capital gains tax up, you will have this rush of landlords selling up which is bad for tenants, puts rents up and makes it very difficult to become a first-time buyer.”

He added: “It’s almost impossible to save for a deposit if you’re a tenant that’s shelling out well over £1,000 a month on rent.”

According to Mitchell, the online estate agency has already seen a wave of landlords exiting the market ahead of the Budget on 30 October.

Reeves is said to be considering bringing CGT rate in line with income tax rates.

Currently, the maximum tax rate on profit from the sale of second homes is just 24%, compared to 45% for wages.

Mitchell pointed to the fact that “punitive” measures such as the removal of tax relief for mortgage interest and the introduction of a 3% stamp duty surcharge had already contributed to landlords selling up and rents spiralling.

“It seems to be very popular to bash landlords. The trouble is these policies bashing landlords end up hurting tenants because it just further reduces the supply of stock in the sector,” he said.

HMRC calculations show a 10% increase in the higher CGT rate could backfire and lose the Treasury £2bn in 2027-28.

Meanwhile, a single percentage point increase in the higher rate might pull in only £110m per year.

Mitchell said he was doubtful the policy would either increase supply for first-time buyers or raise funds for the Treasury.

“It won’t do either, I don’t think,” he said, adding this would “defeat the purpose” of raising the levy.

He added the government could consider introducing some form of tax relief for landlords that would also help first-time buyers.

“If they do put capital gains tax for buy-to-let investors, then why not look at more entrepreneurial schemes – for example, reducing that tax burden if you sell a property to your own tenant or a first-time buyer?

“That could be a virtuous circle of helping first-time buyers and not being too punitive to landlords as well.”

 

Tenants competing for fewer properties as landlords flee the rental market

 

x

Email the story to a friend!



4 Comments

  1. MickRoberts

    Well said Sam:
    The trouble is these policies bashing landlords end up hurting tenants because it just further reduces the supply of stock in the sector,”
    I’m biggest provider in Nottingham to Benefit tenants over 27 years & I ain’t housing em any more.

    Report
    1. NW.Landlord

      Surely you should give them some compensation then Mick? 🙂

      Why don’t Generation rent and Shelter crowd fund to help those being evicted – the idea of compensation could be seen as fair if the target wasn’t automatically the landlord. Just stay for free, the landlord can suck it up.

      How to attract a new generation of landlords as many of the current reach retirement age and step away …. not.

      Report
      1. MickRoberts

        Ooh yes, if I say No to anything in the bill, then we need to fined £1000 each time don’t we. That will help bring rents down & increase supply surely.

        Report
  2. robinpbradford@gmail.com

    The UK’s private rented residential sector has lost approximately 400,000 rental homes since 2016. The majority of Landlords leaving today is due to over priced taxation and not being able to get back their investment. It’s a no brainier. Landlords are fleeing and reinvesting elsewhere.

    Successive governments have sold over 2M of their own social homes by way of right to buy. Tenants have become owners and almost half, have resold and pocketed the cash. This policy has netted successive governments over £50bn. Were even 10% of this figure utilised in the provision of building new homes for the homeless and poor it would result in a reducing dramatically the financial burden on local authorities. Ironically over £15Bn is now spent on housing benefit annually, much of which would have been saved had the government housing stock not have been sold off in the first place.

    Report
X

You must be logged in to report this comment!

Leave a reply

If you want to create a user account so you can log in, click here

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.