More than 25,000 first-time buyers are predicted to miss the stamp duty deadline and complete in April instead, new analysis from Rightmove shows.
The estimate is measured by homes with two-bedrooms or fewer, a typical home a first-time buyer would purchase, and priced up to £625,000, which is the current maximum stamp duty threshold to be considered a first-time buyer.
In total, an estimated nearly 74,000 home-movers in England are currently going through the legal completion process and will just miss the March 31st deadline, and complete in April. The total number of homes currently going through the legal completion process is much higher, however most were never likely to make the 31st March deadline.
The net effect for this group, who are set to complete just one month later, is a collective £142 million in additional stamp duty tax, compared with what they would have paid if they’d been able to complete in March. For first-time buyers, it is a total of £34 million extra in costs.
The analysis looked at the total number of homes currently going through the legal completion process, and the date they are likely to complete, based on factors including the area and type of property. The data is based on homes marked Sold Subject to Contract (SSTC) and Rightmove data on the average time to complete a home purchase, which is currently 163 days, or just over five months.
At a regional level, buyers in the South East are set to be most impacted, with the highest number of movers from the region set to only just miss out on the stamp duty deadline, and complete later in April. With the South East being the second highest-priced region for homes, this group is likely to face greater costs.
Due to the stamp duty thresholds, different types of buyers are set to be disproportionately affected by the upcoming changes.
An average home-mover in England will face an extra £2,500 in stamp duty costs from 1st April. However, while first-time buyers of homes priced at £300,000 or less will continue to pay no stamp duty, first-time buyers of homes priced between £500,001 and £625,000 are the most affected group of all, facing an extra £11,250 in costs.
With home-movers understandably eager to avoid unnecessary extra costs, Rightmove has predicted a conveyancing log-jam as 31st March fast approaches, and those going through the completion process try to get their purchase over the line.
Rightmove is calling for a short extension to the stamp duty deadline by the government, to help the 74,000 home-movers who will only just miss out on the deadline and end up paying more tax through no fault of their own. Particularly the 25,000 first-time buyers who will already be saving and stretching themselves as far as they can to get onto the property ladder.
Rightmove’s Colleen Babcock said: “We expect a rush to complete close to March 31st as first-time buyers and home-movers try to avoid paying extra in tax. Our numbers show how there is a relatively small, but disproportionately impacted group of first-time buyers who will be caught out by the changing thresholds, highlighting some disparities in the way the current system works. With 74,000 people only just set to miss the deadline, in part because of the extremely lengthy completion times in England, we think it would make sense to grant a short extension to the deadline and help these movers, rather than have them face higher charges when they complete later in April.”

Reflecting on Rightmove’s estimate, Nathan Emerson, CEO of Propertymark, shared his thoughts.
He commented: “There will be a lot of first-time buyers disheartened by the fact that they will have to pay, in some cases, thousands of extra pounds to complete their house purchase from April especially as many of the delays experienced will have been out of the buyers’ control due to issues presented in the property chain.
“Moving forward, we know that those determined to buy a home and step onto the property ladder will factor this into their costs. However, for some, this is not possible or will not be easy to accomplish. The extra cost may come as a blow and set people back from being able to make their aspirations of owning a property a reality.
“It’s important that the UK government takes this into consideration moving forward and in order to keep the property chain moving fluently well into the future, financial support may well be needed.”
We’re worried about saving home buyers millions?
The scam of conveyancing firms fleecing clients of additional funds by charging a fee for exchanging and completing within a five day window might be one to start with?
There’s 8 figures a year…..(Yes, really).
As for this request…
May I just point out the very very obvious?
If you extend the deadline then there will be new buyers trying to make the new deadline. Therefore as we approach the newly extended deadline we can have the same headline. Expressing concern still for all the buyers who won’t make it.
Would we not be better to all point out to Gov that affordability is still constrained and this stamp tinkering means little to gov coffers and a lot to the market. Therefore scrap the change in full?
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
Agree – moving the deadline will create another deadline & inherent rush to complete. Some might remember the abolishing of double mortgage relief.,
So the Governments panacea to create housing – especially for example true first time buyers to reduce the SDLT threshold appears so logical !
There’s more common sense in a kindergarten than current policies running the country – completely clueless.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
A ridiculous, unthought out suggestion to extend the deadline. How far down the road are we going to kick the can?
An extension will only bring more people into the rush hour who are instructing now with little chance of proceeding before the current deadline, but given extra time will try to go for it. There has to be a cut off date, no matter how unfair, and people will always miss out as a result of that.
More sensible, as alluded to above, would be just to scrap the deadline completely and leave the current thresholds where they are forever. But we do not have a governement that knows what it is doing so that is unlikley to happen. Actually based on that summation they probably will extend the deadline!
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register