The number of women and people of colour in senior roles within conveyancing remains ‘unsatisfactory’, according to The Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC).
Despite various initiatives designed to lower barriers to entry and ensure fair career progression across the entire legal profession, the regulator says change is ‘very slow’.
It has now launched a public consultation on changes to its Equality Code in a bid to ensure regulated practices and individuals are meeting expectations.
There are two main changes proposed which relate to the way the CLC collects data on diversity and complaints of discrimination, victimisation or harassment.
Sheila Kumar, chief executive of the CLC, said: “It is important that the legal profession reflects – to the greatest extent possible – the diversity of the population it serves.
“Although the CLC’s non-graduate profession is more closely reflective of society than some other branches of legal sector, the fact that women and people of colour do not progress to senior positions in the proportions they should indicates that more action is needed to make effective and sustainable changes.
“These proposals are intended to deliver, and maintain, positive improvements by giving the CLC more levers to effect change and we are keen to hear what people think.”
Since the Equality Code was introduced, following the passing of the Equality Act in 2010, the CLC has gathered three sets of diversity data from its regulated community.
While the response from individuals was said to be good, the preferred method of collecting data from practices was less successful, prompting concerns that some firms may not be seeking the information from their employees.
The consultation proposes that a new requirement is written into its Equality Code, compelling regulated practices to “cooperate with the CLC in the collection and analysis of data about their workforce and owners as may be required by the CLC from time to time.”
In order to help monitor and drive change, the CLC further proposes that, when required, practices “report any instances of complaints of discrimination, victimisation or harassment whether as an employer or service provider” and keeps records to enable them to do so.
Kumar added: “It is appropriate for the CLC as a regulator to examine where regulated bodies and individuals are or may be failing to comply with our regulatory arrangements and expectations.
“To help achieve this, the CLC needs to be able to collect data on all complaints related to discrimination, victimisation and harassment made by employees of a practice, its clients or members of the public.
“Where this data provides evidence of non-compliance with the code (or more broadly), the CLC will then be able to take proportionate action.”
A joint statement issued recently by the Legal Services Board along with eight legal regulators, including the CLC, underlined their commitment to tackling counter-inclusive misconduct.
“We know regulation alone is not the answer, but as legal service regulators we have considerable influence over how legal professionals behave,” it said.
“We oversee the way lawyers are trained and educated. We set standards of conduct and expectations of professional behaviour. And we have powers to act where conduct falls below those expectations and through our disciplinary processes.”
Anyone working in the conveyancing industry or with insight into the challenges of delivering a diverse workforce and inclusive client services is invited to take part in the consultation, full details of which are available here.
Responses can be sent up until the closing date of 30 August either via email consultations@clc-uk.or or by post to: The Council for Licensed Conveyancers, WeWork, 131 Finsbury Pavement, London, EC2A 1NT.
All responses will be published but can be anonymous if requested.
The consultation includes additional draft guidance that will be finalised following the consultation and that will assist firms in meeting their obligations under the Equality Code.
The number of women at the front line/coal face of conveyancing certainly exceeds the number of men. Let’s hope a decent percentage of them move into senior positions soon.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
I will employ /promote the best person for the job simple as that
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
I was just thinking the same thing. What other “action” could be required or desired? Why would anyone want an employer to choose an employee on the basis of skin colour or LGBTQAI+ status over their ability to do the best job? Seems very divisive.
It’s the kind of thing you hear from angry women and weak men, claiming they want love and acceptance for all, while sowing the seeds for division and hate, unable to tolerate anyone with a different political opinion.
Hopefully people will see through their twisted agenda and we can get back to judging people on the content of their character.
This is a very scary sentence: “the fact that women and people of colour do not progress to senior positions in the proportions they should indicates that more action is needed”
The implication being that this is not down to different life choices women very wisely make over the strange and destructive decisions men make. Men and women are different, so choices and outcomes are different.
Women aged 22-29 earn more than men in the UK. The drop in average pay only happens because women around 30 choose to put their family first, while men around 30 choose to put their careers first.
Men are more likely to go bankrupt and more likely to take their lives due to stress at work. True that some men are hyper successful, (they often work 80 hours a week), but a lot of men are worse off and have fewer options than women. Lumping all men in with a few outliers who do have high earnings, is not at all appropriate and should not be used to justify any “action” no matter how well meaning it might appear to be.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
Best person for the job, should always get the job….stop interfering!
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register