If this is the new normal, heaven help us

Peter Ambrose
Peter Ambrose

These days, it seems everything needs a phrase. Ideally of three words.

At least, that’s what it seems when you look at the utterances from 10 Downing Street – who can forget “Build Back Better” or “Hands Face Space”.

When it comes to the home buying and selling process, “The New Normal” seems popular and if this is the case, we’re in a whole heap of trouble.

We had a few spare minutes when we weren’t sitting around eating bonbons, so we looked at how long deals were taking since the end of the Stamp Duty holiday in October, when things were supposed to get back to normal.

What we found was not particularly encouraging.  Our average transaction times jumped from 12 weeks in September 2021 to 17 weeks in March this year.

So what’s happening and what, if anything, can we do about it?

It’s complicated – no surprise here.

Like everything to do with property, finding out what is going on is tricky.

It’s no surprise that chains are seen as a major culprit – they get blamed for everything.  If only Boris Johnson had said his lockdown party woes were due to chains, everyone would nodded sagely, agreed, and moved on.

The problem is that chains themselves are not necessarily the issue, but a failure of a component within them.  Someone forgets to apply for a mortgage, a lawyer refuses to draft a deed of variation or a co-freeholder can’t be bothered to sign a transfer – all the usual stuff.

However, what has changed is that chains used to typically be 2-3 properties, whereas now we often see 5-6.  Agents tell me this is caused by disconnected chains joining together as the rental market is moving too fast for the person at the top to move into rented accommodation.

In any event, this issue is not going away soon.

Maybe remote working isn’t all it’s cracked up to be

There’s no easy way to say this.

It’s becoming increasingly difficult to speak to other lawyers.  When you call a law firm, too often the person answering the phone apologetically explains that the lawyer is working remotely, so they cannot put the call through and it’s best to email.

Which is frustrating, particularly when clients complain that “the problem with you lawyers is you don’t pick up the phone to the other side”.

After two years, surely it not beyond the wit of business owners to give their lawyers mobile phones and a way to transfer calls to them. Maybe even electronic access to the details of their files.  If firms are going to allow their lawyers to work remotely, they must give them the tools to do the job; and that doesn’t mean suitcases for carrying files to and from the office.

Lack of urgency

In the halcyon days of 2021, people had dug out their pitchforks and were busily making hay with a palpable sense of urgency.   This just doesn’t seem to be happening these days.

We suspect it might be caused by increased caseloads, potentially due to fewer staff so lawyers simply don’t have the time to follow up.

There is also a feeling that buyers are not pushing hard to get deals through.

Finally, it could be due to general weariness – let’s face it, property lawyers have had a tough few years, and candidates tell us of gruelling working hours which will take their toll.

Lack of experience

Battle-weary experienced solicitors are complaining about the problems caused by a lack of experience in lawyers running cases.  They have a point, in that this can result in more enquiries being raised, delays in clauses being drafted and an inability to take decisions, which does result in delays.

However, this problem is caused by a lack of training and support which means inexperienced staff simply have too much responsibility.  This is due to the way that owners of law firms are running their businesses and only they can address this issue.  They must reduce the caseloads overall, and in particular, for their senior lawyers so they can supervise junior lawyers.  This can only be achieved by increasing the fees that they currently charge, and be prepared to reduce the money they take out of the business.

So what happens now?

Everyone knows that slower deals impact the finances of law firms and agents.  Last year, we exchanged 90% of our pipeline in 90 days, compared to this March where it dropped to 55%.

Fewer deals mean less money, meaning fewer staff – not a pleasant spiral in anyone’s world.

Caseloads must be reduced by increased pricing and the process, in particular, enquiry handling, must be streamlined to reduce the delays.

Unless this happens, business owners may need to learn another three word phrase in the future; “Heaven Help Us”.

Peter Ambrose is founder of conveyancing specialist The Partnership. 

 

x

Email the story to a friend!



5 Comments

  1. Rob Hailstone

    Chain sheets would really help:)

    Firms that increased their fees, should keep them up (and remunerate well) and not drop them at the first signs of a slow own, if they want to retain good conveyancers, recruit existing conveyancers or train new ones.

    Report
  2. OnlineEA

    I can first hand confirm much of your article is on the money.  So many conveyancing staff are working at home and have no ability of a call being patched through or even a working works mobile.  It’s so so poor on their employers thinking this Is acceptable and just further compounds existing communication issues and therefore more often not, unnecessary delays.

    Report
  3. CBAXTER30

    Perhaps a root and branch overhaul of the conveyancing process is likely to be the only route forward. Tinkering with an outmoded system wont. I know that the American style system of insuring everything has not been met with great enthusiasm within our legal  framework probably because it would make most of the legal work redundant, however any transaction of whatever kind taking over 100 days and likely to only go backwards is not a system fit for today.

    Report
  4. Robert_May

    Client confidentiality when a buyer is sale agreed, memorandum of sales issued on multiple properties is something that needs tackling

     

    “Sorry, don’t bother irritating us with follow up calls on  this particular sale, it is NEVER going to happen, my client will only proceed if the one they really want falls through (and then the other two that are ahead of this one)”      “Yes they do have a complete chain, the chain is progressing but not on your particular sale”

    Report
  5. SilasJLees

    Excellent article Peter and one which backs up our own research into the Conveyancing processes.
    Comprehensive solutions to these problems already exist and can be implemented very quickly by those lawyers with an open mind to reduce their workload by increasing profits. The added bonus being ease of updating clients and agents simultaneously do all parties know what’s going on.
    Not a panacea by any means but enough to handle at least 80% of everyday transactions. Law firm owners just need the courage to look at new systems and new ways of doing things – and we’d be more than happy to help! Silas @ WiggyWam

    Report
X

You must be logged in to report this comment!

Comments are closed.

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.