The proportion of buy-to-let properties purchased in Southern England dropped to a record low last year, continuing a trend seen since the stamp duty surcharge for additional properties was introduced in 2016.
Paragon Bank analysis of industry data revealed that just over a third (35%) of properties purchased with a buy-to-let mortgage during 2023 were in the South East, Greater London and the South West.
This was down from 39% in 2022 and has fallen from a high of 52% in 2015, the year before the Stamp Duty surcharge was introduced. Since 2015, the proportion of stock purchased in Southern regions has fallen each year, aside from 2020 and 2021 when the Stamp Duty Holiday was introduced during the Covid pandemic.
Broken down further, the proportion of mortgaged buy-to-let homes purchased in London fell from 19% of the UK total in 2015 to 12% last year. The South East declined from 24% to 17% over the same period, whilst the South West fell from 9% to 6% of the total.
2015 | 2023 | |
South East | 24% | 17% |
North West |
9% |
14% |
Greater London | 19% | 12% |
West Midlands | 8% | 10% |
Yorkshire & Humber | 6% | 10% |
East Midlands | 7% | 9% |
Scotland | 6% | 7% |
North East | 4% | 7% |
South West | 9% | 6% |
Wales | 3% | 4% |
East Anglia | 4% | 3% |
Conversely, the proportion of homes purchased in the North West increased from 9% in 2015 to 14% in 2023, with the Yorkshire & Humber growing from 6% to 10% of mortgaged buy-to-let purchases.
All other regions recorded an increase in the proportion of buy-to-let homes purchased between 2015 and 2023, apart from the East of England, another area of above-average house prices.
Paragon Bank managing director of mortgages, Richard Rowntree, said: “The introduction of the stamp duty surcharge disproportionately impacted those markets with above average house prices in the south of England. For example, compared to 2015, the number of homes purchased with a buy-to-let mortgage was 70% lower last year, and a greater number of buy-to-let homes were purchased in the North West than in London during three of the past five years.
“Over the long-term, it’s clear that we will need more rental homes and a vibrant private rented sector across the UK. With the population forecast to increase by 9.9% – or by 6.6 million people – by 2036, demand for rental property is only going to be stronger. That is particularly true of areas in the South of the country, particularly London where the transient population means that a strong supply of rental homes vital.”
He added: “We are seeing the PRS utilised by a broader range of people than ever before and those who want or need to rent a home should expect to be able to choose from a range of fairly priced, decent quality rental homes. Unless supply is boosted to meet forecast growth in demand, rents will only grow higher in markets with extreme supply/demand imbalances.”
This is what the Government/Shelter/Generation Rent/Acorn want but can’t help thinking they are shooting themselves in the foot. The only people suffering are the tenants.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
Either by design or by chance everything is pointing towards a PRS dominated by B2R in the long term.
My gut feels it is by design due to the prohibative tax regs dealt to the 2.5mill UK landlords at a time demand was increasing as a long term trend. These tax regs of course won’t affect the 20 or so dominating corporations, leaving plenty for political backhanders.
It’s believable because we’ve all seen it before, and we’ll see it again. Well, if everyone keeps voting for the current stock of blue and red muppets. Not too long ago most people voted for each other…
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
As landlords, we put our money where we believe we will achieve the best return, for the least hassle. For me, that’s no longer BTL, but I will have a little dabble in BTR.
Osborne really put the BTR model on the road when he introduced S24. I believe it’s S24 which is largely responsible for the drop in available private rentals.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register