A new landlord survey has revealed that the majority of respondent – 62% – intend to maintain or increase their portfolio over the next year despite the likely enactment of the Renters (Reform) Bill in the meantime.
The research, carried out by Leaders Romans Group (LRG), which includes Acorn, Gibbs Gillespie, Hose Rhodes Dickson, John Payne, Langford Russell, Leaders, Northfields, Portico, Romans and Scott Fraser, found that more than half – 55% – of the 630 landlords surveyed do not plan to change their approach to property investment as a result of the Renters Reform Bill.
Many explained that their approach to property investment was long-term and that they would not rush to leave the private rented sector.
The research also considered which aspects of the Bill caused the greatest concern to landlords. Interestingly, this was not the potential abolition of Section 21, but tenants’ right to request to keep a pet.
Asked about whether the proposed change regarding pets was positive or negative for landlords, 56% said that the impact would be negative. In comparison, 54% said that the abolition of Section 21 would have a negative impact.
Landlords saw some positives in the draft legislation: 63% said that easier repossession if a tenant is at fault was welcome and 52% supported the introduction of an ombudsman.
Rather than being significantly worried about the imminent legislation, landlords’ concerns are mostly financial, relating to high mortgage rates, the cost of bureaucracy and regulations, increased taxes, the cost of overheads such as service charges and maintenance costs, and VAT on contractors’ fees.
Allison Thompson, national lettings managing director of LRG, said: “Although there are some substantial changes in the private rented sector, both political and financial, the so-called ‘landlord exodus’ is being overstated – as this research demonstrates. Yes, there are some significant issues with the Renters (Reform) Bill but LRG and others have been actively involved in shaping this legislation so that it is fairer on landlords – who after all, are the mainstay of the property industry and depended upon by Government to provide homes to some of those most in need.
“As local authority housing waiting lists continue to increase, I hope that Government will reflect on landlords’ vital role and take their views into account as the legislation passes through Parliament.”
The Renters (Reform) Bill is approaching its Third Reading in the House of Commons and will the move to the House of Lords. LRG will continue to use landlord and tenant insight to influence the emerging legislation.
Leaders would want this to be the case but with Labour on the horizon it seems that every LL I know (all 50yo) are thinking differently, wonder what the views of the great and good on here are?
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
I agree, but even if they are right in what they say, I think they should be very worried about the 38% that aren’t getting the warm and cozy feeling. So should Government and so should the so-called ‘charities’.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
Of course you’re better of offering to the tenant first but if not the premises will be empty a minimum of 6 months which is a lot of homeless people.
I gave notice to tenants a year ago and advised the tenants to contact shelter, who just wanted to make certain I had served the correct notices, it seems they have a website and phone line and charity shops but no actual housing or help to find housing. Seems to be a very profitable “Charity”
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
In two words, “Shelter don’t”.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
Shelter actually receives Government grants and donations of over £2 million but, of course, house no one. In fact the monies donated help no one except a few wealthy lawyers.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
Helps Polly Bleat though.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
I was really worried about Labour, but it turns out Rayner has been renting out a former council house and living somewhere else. Surely it would be hypocritical to clamp down on private landlords – or look closely at landlords tax affairs?
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
“63% said that easier repossession if a tenant is at fault was welcome.” And it will be if that is what actually happens. However, unless landlords obtain professional advice, they may get caught out as the RRB slips in a requirement that even in cases of rent arrears the claim will be thrown out if the tenancy deposit has not been protected correctly and the Prescribed Information served. A nasty and unnecessary trap.
“Easier” does not necessarily imply quicker. As has been widely reported, the backlog at the courts will get much worse when more cases under s8 have to be heard. It will be of little comfort to landlords of non-paying tenants that their case was decided without much trouble but it took months longer to get a decision.
This kind of survey is unhelpful and potentially misleading. If LRG think all is well in the Kingdom of Denmark, they should think again.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register