New anti-money laundering guidelines for estate agents suggest that terrorist criminals may pay large deposits which they re-claim later, pay prices for properties just below Stamp Duty thresholds, bribe staff, or attempt to rush transactions through.
Estate agents should also beware of buyers who have not viewed the property, but only seen it on the internet.
HMRC’s new guidelines also say that agents should also ask to see clients’ tax advice on certain occasions – for example, if it looks as though they are trying to avoid Inheritance Tax.
Another area of concern is “acceptance of disproportionate corporate hospitality”.
The new guidelines are published after HMRC took over responsibility for anti-money laundering regulations from the OFT in April this year.
In virtually its last act, the OFT hit three agents with enormous fines, alleging anti-money laundering breaches.
Hastings International, in London, was fined £47,966; Jackson Grundy in Northampton, was fined £169,652; and Jeffrey Ross, of Cardiff, was hit with £29,000.
Lawyers have warned agents that future fines are likely to be in line with these, and that agents could be found to be in breach where there has been no anti-money laundering activity at all – only where a possible risk has been identified.
The new guidelines, which have been in draft until now, do not explicitly acknowledge that it is letting agents, rather than sales agents, that handle money.
However, they do say that under the Proceeds of Crime Act, it is a failure to report suspicious activity and this obligation extends across the whole business – “so an estate agency business which also does lettings must also submit suspicious activity reports for its lettings”.
The guidelines also say that landlords who do not comply with their legal obligations, and tenants who attempt to sell properties they are renting, are potential concerns for agents.
The guidance underlines that estate agents – although not letting agents – must register with HMRC.
Failure to do so could result in unlimited fines or prison.
However, the guidelines admit that for most estate agents, money laundering is hardly an every day risk.
In curious language and employing a strange use of capital letters, it says: “It’s unlikely that a high street Estate Agency Business in a small market town will come across customers involved in terrorist financing.
“A business in a metropolitan area with an international clientele presents a completely different risk profile.”
All agents are told they should have written policy statements, making clear how they will prevent money laundering and terrorist financing. This includes having a nominated member of staff who should report any suspicions.
The guidelines are here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/321830/MLR2007.pdf
It has never ceased to amaze me why the Government thinks that estate agents can effectively help with this.Real terrorists would be the least "obvious" to us during a property transaction and nigh on impossible to detect to a degree that we could file a report.
Or has anyone been on an inspection where there were 6 dodgy looking people with batteries and wires coming out of their pockets and when they give you their passports the name has been tipp-exed out and replaced with theirs?
"Terrorist criminals pay prices for properties just below Stamp Duty thresholds, bribe staff, or attempt to rush transactions through"…….Got to go now as I must spend the day reporting most of my clients on this basis….ridiculous.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
I presented HMRC a means to cure this as part of an agents annual Section 19 report in May 2012.
Quite literally in under an hour of even the slightest suspicion of anything untoward I could provide HMRC the means to identify both money laundering and Tax evasion. I have a piece of Cream Whithall Velum stating that a solution is not required at the present time.
Agents do not do anything other than their current legal obligation and HMRC only need to look for the Highlighted Red lines on a report.
I have said there is failure of Governance and this story proves it.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register