Picture of the Week (1): A case for Specsavers

Could this be the worst selection of photos ever used to advertise a £930,000 property, asks the reader who kindly sent us this link.

We couldn’t have put it better ourselves!

Don’t bother to adjust your bi-focals before taking a look– it won’t make any difference.

picture of the week (1).20

x

Email the story to a friend!



8 Comments

  1. Jrsteeve

    Get what you pay for.

    Report
  2. AndrewOverman

    Pay peanuts, get monkeys!

    Report
  3. IndAgent

    It’s an extra 14 quid for autofocus

    Report
  4. Typhoon

    Maybe downed by a drone that had been attacked by one of the new police eagles, trained to down them.

     

    Nice to see such poor quality but remember all us “real agents” we have had some shockers ourselves. This is truly a time to show the selling public the true quality we bring them,so keep your standards high.

    Report
  5. PeeBee

    Simple reason for the incredibly awful photos –

    They scraped them all from the previous Agent’s listing!

    Trust me – it’s not the only case either!

    Report
    1. smile please

      Interesting point PeeBee,

      I have always wondered where we stand on photography, are they our property or the vendors?

      Should we have a clause in our agreement that specifies they are our property?

      Report
  6. Will

    The picture was in focus its just the photographer had the wrong glasses on!

    Report
  7. jeremy1960

    Now on with another (local) agent at a higher price but only 5 photos!

    http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-53305230.html

    Report
X

You must be logged in to report this comment!

Comments are closed.

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.