The government says new private investment of £550m will help boost the number of new build homes and make it easier for people to buy a property.
The prime minster Kier Starmer said the money would fund construction of homes across the country because “too many people”, especially the young, “want to get on the housing ladder because they know that owning your own home is sort of base camp for their aspirations in life”.
He added that the new government is “determined to knock away the obstacles” stopping housebuilding.
Schroders, Man Group and Resonance confirmed investment funds yesterday with funds to be used to address directly the shortage of homes by supporting the building of tens of thousands of new homes across the UK, the Treasury said.
The real estate impact fund has an initial target of raising £200m with the aim of ultimately delivering 5,000 homes to address social inequality and deliver an appropriate financial return to investors, expects to make its first investments before the end of 2024.
Meanwhile the government has announced that councils will receive £68m to help build thousands of homes on disused brownfield sites. The money, spread around 54 local authorities, is expected to deliver 5,200 homes on sites such as former car parks and industrial land that can be difficult to build on.
It comes as the government looks to unlock investment to deliver on its aims to build 1.5 million new homes over the next five years.
The announcement of fresh funding came as the chief secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones yesterday hosted a roundtable with some of the biggest impact investors in the world, including Schroders, M&G, International Bank of America, Blackrock and Barclays, as the Government looks to create the right environment for impact investment across the country.
Jones said: “Investors tell us they want to help in delivering a better Britain. Working in partnership with government, social impact investing can change people’s lives and improve communities across the country.
“We are dedicated to creating the right environment for impact investment across the country, and the announcement of over half a billion pounds worth of impact investment building tens of thousands of new homes is a great example of the change that we are delivering on.”
Propertymark is among those that have welcomed fresh support for £550m housing investment from Schroders, Man Group and Resonance.
Nathan Emerson, CEO of Propertymark, commented: “Impact investment funding is certainly one innovative method that can help unlock the potential for new homes across the country, especially as many developers have pledged to support this measure. However, it would be good to see more detail behind these plans as this may help to deliver the ambitious target of nearly two million homes that the UK government has pledged to build by the end of this parliament.
“We eagerly await more details in the UK government’s upcoming Budget about how any housebuilding will be funded, alongside a timetable for the enactment of the Planning and Infrastructure Bill that intends to reform the planning system to make it easier to build these desperately needed homes.”
I don’t believe we have a shortage of homes to buy only homes for rent but Gov. are only building homes for sale. My local council now only builds homes for sale at a profit. They are building 50 new homes for sale at current market prices on land they did not even have to buy. Only 5 are offered at so called affordable rent even though we have 28,000 on our council’s housing waiting list. We have seen thousands of new builds including a new town of 4,000 homes all for sale all within a 5 mile radius. Nothing for rent.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
Take a look at how many new homes are being built in and around York, none of which are what I would call ‘affordable’. 200yds away the council is building expensive passiv houses; with insufficient parking, of course, and with a little social housing tacked on. Why couldn’t they use the land exclusively for social housing? We have old factories being redeveloped, which is laudable, but they are expensive. Apparently nearly all sold, but I don’t know who to. They are way too expensive to be viable rentals in a City which lacks suitable employment at scale.
What we do have is a desperate need for rental properties for ‘working people’, especially key workers. We have 2 large universities within the City’s boundary which sucks up property, and a huge tourist demand for holiday lets and B&Bs. Added to that, the prioritisation [by all councils] of housing refugees and asylum seekers.
They must focus on building social housing for rent. That’s where the problem is. Unfortunately, those holding the land banks need to make large profits for their shareholders.
The large developers were too influential with the previous shower in government. This bunch of idiots stand no chance.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register