Traditionally those who are economically active today fund the cost of today’s state pensions. However, there is a problem brewing. The UK has an ageing population, therefore fewer workers are paying for a growing number of pensioners.
Either taxes will have to rise, or pensions will have to fall. The triple lock suggests that taxes will rise, but does property hold the key to unlocking pensions without breaking the triple lock?
Anthony Codling, CEO of Twindig, looks at the details:
The ageing population
In 1950 10.8% of the UK population was aged 65 or more. By 2018 it had risen to 18% and is expected to reach 25% by 2050.
The £100bn pa pension bill
There are currently 12.4 million people claiming UK state pension at a cost of around £100bn each year. Under the triple lock, this will grow by at least £2.5bn pa.
What is the triple lock?
The triple lock relates to annual increases in the UK state pension. Currently, it increases each year in line with the highest of three metrics (hence it is called the triple lock):
Consumer Price Index (CPI)
Increases in average wages
2.5%
Which part of the triple lock is growing the fastest?
The latest provisional data from the ONS suggests that the highest of the triple lock metrics is wage growth, currently at 8.8%, which would, therefore, add £8.8bn to the cost of the state pension bill. An 8.8% pay rise is great if you are a pensioner, but not so great if you are a taxpayer footing the bill.
Even without the triple lock, the pension bill is growing
The cost of the UK state pension is expected to rise each year as more and more people qualify for a state pension. We estimate that before increases to the level of state pension, the state pension bill will increase by at least £725m per year for the next three years and then by more than £1,000m until 2028 before increasing to more than £2,000m a year from 2029 as our population ages.
The cost of the triple lock, at least £2,500m each year will be on top of the figures described above.
How quickly have pensions grown?
If we look at the basic weekly UK state pension since the turn of the century the average annual inflation is 3.5% pa. Over the last 20 years therefore the UK state pension has increased by more than the lower limit established by the triple lock.
Can property solve the pension problem?
Across the country, 78% of households headed by someone aged 65 or higher are owned, and only 6% of those still have a mortgage.
Across the country, 64% of households who own their home outright (with no mortgage), are headed by a person aged 65 or more.
Homeownership is increasingly becoming an age-related issue
The ONS estimate that the number of households headed by someone aged 65 or more is projected to increase by 54% by 2041, which will bring the total number of households headed by someone aged 65 or more to almost 10 million, whereas the number of households headed by someone under 65 is projected to grow by just 3%
However, homeownership is already an age-related issue as the graph below illustrates, homeownership rates are declining for the traditional ‘first-time buyer’, whilst homeownership rats continue to increase for the older generation.
Homes are our biggest assets
Homes are the biggest assets for the majority of households. However, they cannot currently use them as part of their pension planning.
Since 1930, on average, UK house price inflation has been 7% pa, few other asset classes, if any, can match this level of performance, in our view.
Older households have huge amounts of equity tied up in their homes, whilst younger households struggle to get a foothold on the housing ladder.
Why are properties locked out of pensions?
If residential properties were able to become a pensionable asset class, we believe they could be the key to solving the UK’s current pension dilemma.
Allowing property in pensions would provide an orderly intergenerational transfer of housing wealth and help older households fund a more comfortable retirement, whilst not letting pensions break the public finances.
Property, in our view, is the key to unpicking the triple lock without breaking the pensions they protect.
Some excellent stats from Mr Coddling, as always.
The chance of Sunak considering this as an option is zero. It’s more likely that the triple lock will be adjusted to take 2021 / 22 into account. The Tories can’t afford to lose the grey vote.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
Unlikely to happen .
Just think how it would turn the Equity Release market on its head being able to use your pension pot to buy your house.
Being able to tax shelter residential property in pensions would create a massive shift from investing in equites in SIPPS.
Rocket fuel for house prices and make it even more difficult for first time buyers getting on the ladder .
Far from losing the grey vote there would be a stampede to acquire residential property to include in their SIPPs
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
This all ignores the fact that our state pension is the worst in the G7 and needs to be increased steadily to a rate in which elderly people are rewarded for the their work and for paying taxes into the community for over half a century. Far more sensible is to tax or reduce the state pension for those with independent retirement income over £40,000 p.a. Socialist in principle – yes – but far better than yet again fuelling house prices at the expense of younger people who may never have a chance to own a home of their own. We live in a different world now.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
“our state pension is the worst in the G7 and needs to be increased steadily to a rate in which elderly people are rewarded for the their work and for paying taxes into the community for over half a century.”
Or at least the percentage of them that this applies to. What about the others – the career scroungers, the fiddlers and their likes who have taken and never or rarely given, Richard Copus? Those that have been a drain on society for most or all of their “working” lives? (And before the PC brigade call for my head on a pike, I am not referring to the many genuine cases where people are unable/incapable to work for a myriad of totally justifiable reasons.)
We all know someone who plays the system. What “reward” should they be entitled to for their sterling work in taking the benefits system for every penny they can get and more?
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
The easy answer is that you get back a % of what you put in. While entirely unsocial (and likely unethical), it is entirely justifiable. HMRC would have a record of how much tax you’ve paid over your lifetime and your pension is determined on that; the more tax you’ve paid the higher your pension.
However that is not a very good way to look at it as it treats the elderly as a simply statistic. Lets be fair, the Government doesn’t exactly have a good track record of elderly care. There is no easy answer and indeed any answer will likely upset someone, so the greatest good for the greatest number is the way (flashback of Hot Fuzz “the Greater Good” comes to mind).
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register
A very pointed remark PeeBee! Those hangers on are a small percentage of people as we all know. Also, a lot of them are not receiving full state pension (it’s surprising how many people aren’t). Some people will always break through the net. We all know OAPs in their seventies and above who have worked their socks off all their lives and have only the state pension to rely on who can’t afford foreign holidays and a meal out once a month if they’re lucky, who are pretty much trapped in their lifestyles for life. These are not “scroungers, fiddlers and the like” but decent people who deserve more for all the hard work they have given.
You must be logged in to like or dislike this comments.
Click to login
Don't have an account? Click here to register