Which postcodes are most profitable for estate agents?

Data specialists, Address Intelligence, claim to have uncovered where estate agents and insurance companies can typically expect to find their highest value customers, although the study does not take in to consideration the differing estate agency fees charged in each area.

The data insight company undertook research in which it looked at household and property statistics for every postcode in England and Wales, in order to map out average household income and combine it with average property prices.

London and surrounding areas unsurprisingly dominate the top 10, with the London West (W) postcode area seeing the highest combined average in the country. This was the only region to top a million pounds with a total of £1,053,335. Southwest London (SW) was the second highest at £979,838.

All the top five highest value postcodes fell within London with London West Central (WC), London Northwest (NW) and London East Central (EC) all totalling above £800,000 when their property price and household income averages were combined.

Of the top 20 highest value postcodes, only two were located outside of Greater London with Watford (WD) the 10th highest value postcode at £615,997 and Guildford (GU) placing 14th with a combined salary and property value average of £588,406.

Of the 104 postcodes in England and Wales, when average household income and average property value were combined the top twenty performing postcodes were as follows;

Postcode Location Combined Averages (£)
1. W London W 1,053,335
2. SW London SW 979,838
3. WC London WC 892,466
4. NW London NW 870,521
5. EC London EC 827,721
6. KT Kingston Upon Thames 735,857
7. N London N 699,369
8. AL St. Albans 658,678
9. SL Slough 619,105
10. WD Watford 615,997
11. TW Twickenham 607,323
12. BR Bromley 604,814
13. HA Harrow 604,759
14. GU Guildford 588,406
15. SE London SE 550,782
16. HP Hemel Hempstead 548,025
17. E London E 538,972
18. EN Enfield 531,563
19. IG Ilford 528,726
20. SM Sutton 517,923

Whilst the majority of the high-value postcodes were in or around London, 18 of the bottom 20 lowest value areas were all in the north of England. Sunderland (SR) scored lowest with a combined average of £158,575 which is roughly seven times less than the highest value postcode.

The bottom three postcodes all fell within the Northeast with Cleveland (TS) and Durham (DH) as the other two lowest value areas. Blackburn (BB) and Wigan (WN) rounded out the bottom five with combined salary and property price averages of £187,058 and £190,275 respectively.  Swansea (SA) and Stoke-on-Trent (ST) were the only areas outside of the North to rank in the bottom 20 postcode areas for value.

Harrogate (HG) was the highest value postcode North of Cambridge, bucking the trend of surrounding areas in the North with a combined average of £432,479.

Of the 104 postcodes in England and Wales, when average household income and average property value were combined, the bottom twenty performing postcodes were as follows (with number 1 referring to the lowest-performing);

Postcode Location Combined Averages (£)
1. SR Sunderland 158,575
2. TS Cleveland 179,575
3. DH Durham 183,219
4. BB Blackburn 187,058
5. WN Wigan 190,275
6. DN Doncaster 192,358
7. OL Oldham 192,757
8. FY Blackpool 195,993
9. HU Hull 199,451
10. WF Wakefield 203,085
11. BD Bradford 203,642
12. DL Darlington 205,499
13. L Liverpool 206,800
14. NE Newcastle 211,768
15. S Sheffield 211,906
16. SA Swansea 212,998
17. CA Carlisle 217,489
18. HX Halifax 217,863
19. ST Stoke on Trent 220,314
20. BL Bolton 220,315

James Colebeck, operations director at Address Intelligence, commented: “Being able to target more affluent areas can be incredibly beneficial to businesses especially in the real estate and insurance sectors. Knowing where to invest for potential future growth can be priceless, with areas like Harrogate outperforming their surrounding regions.

“At Address Intelligence we analyse the latest data and by sharing our valuable insights with our clients, we help businesses make decisions based on where they will get the best return.”

x

Email the story to a friend!



One Comment

  1. PeeBee

    If we had to wait three days for the article covering Chris Wood’s hard-fought and wholly justified victory to clear his reputation against an incompetent NTSELAT, I can only assume this ‘scoop’ hit the editor’s desk no earlier than last February.

    Report
X

You must be logged in to report this comment!

Comments are closed.

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.