New ruling on bedrooms says size doesn’t count

A court ruling on what constitutes a bedroom could have implications for estate and letting agents nervous about how they describe the number of bedrooms in a property.

It’s tiny: so is it a bedroom or would you be safer calling it a boxroom?

Essentially, says a new ruling, if you can get a single bed into a room it counts as a bedroom, not a boxroom – regardless of size.

The Government, in the form of the Department for Work and Pensions, had appealed against an earlier decision when a court ruled that a room measuring less than 50 sq ft is not a bedroom.

The judge, Simon Collins, also ruled that a room measuring between 50 and 70 sq ft could only be used by a child aged under ten.

That ruling was entirely in line with the 1936 Public Health Act: no room less than 50 sq ft (4.65 square metres) was allowable as a bedroom, and any room between 50 and 70 sq ft was a “half-person” bedroom. This space standard is in the Housing Act 1985, s.326 and in the Housing (Scotland) Act 1987, s.137.

So you might think that the law was the law.

However, the DWP seems to have mounted a successful challenge in a case revolving around the so-called “bedroom tax”.

The social housing tenant said that he should not have to suffer a 14% cut in housing benefit because the room in question was so small.

He said it measured 66 sq ft and was therefore a boxroom and not a bedroom.

The latest ruling, however, goes in favour of the DWP, which said it has always maintained that if a room is big enough to accommodate a single bed, it is a bedroom.

However, this may not be the end of the matter, as another appeal is said to be likely.

x

Email the story to a friend!



6 Comments

  1. undercover agent

    A single bed is aprox 17 sq ft and a double is aprox 28 sq ft

    Report
  2. Blue

    "Essentially, says a new ruling, if you can get a single bed into a room it counts as a bedroom, not a boxroom – regardless of size"… does it count if the bed is stood on it'e end or is still flat packed ?

    Report
  3. sspm

    Would this be the case in a HMO too?

    Report
    1. Woodentop

      Interesting point considering minimum size for occupancy has led to many an eviction.

      Report
  4. JungleProperty

    Using the 'single bed' as a measuring standard is laughable. Now is that a small single, single, single extra long, king single or super single or a sawn off futon designed for a dwarf from Ikea?

    Report
  5. drasperger

    There are at least 50 landlords in Oxford who have been told that their bedrooms are too small to let….what about a class action against the city for loss of income over the last six years or so?

    Report
X

You must be logged in to report this comment!

Comments are closed.

Thank you for signing up to our newsletter, we have sent you an email asking you to confirm your subscription. Additionally if you would like to create a free EYE account which allows you to comment on news stories and manage your email subscriptions please enter a password below.